Evaluation of Performance of Detection of Immunoglobulin G and Immunoglobulin M Antibody Against Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 by a Rapid Kit in a Real-Life Hospital Setting
- PMID: 35558113
- PMCID: PMC9087894
- DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.802292
Evaluation of Performance of Detection of Immunoglobulin G and Immunoglobulin M Antibody Against Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 by a Rapid Kit in a Real-Life Hospital Setting
Abstract
Background: Antibody testing is often used for serosurveillance of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and chemiluminescence-based antibody tests are quite sensitive and specific for such serological testing. Rapid antibody tests against different antigens are developed and effectively used for this purpose. However, their diagnostic efficiency, especially in real-life hospital setting, needs to be evaluated. Thus, the present study was conducted in a dedicated COVID-19 hospital in New Delhi, India, to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of a rapid antibody kit against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
Methods: Sixty COVID-19 confirmed cases by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were recruited and categorized as early, intermediate, and late cases based on the days passed after their first RT-PCR-positive test report, with 20 subjects in each category. Twenty samples from pre-COVID era and 20 RT-PCR-negative collected during the study period were taken as controls. immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against the RBD of the spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 virus were detected by rapid antibody test and compared with the total antibody against the nucleocapsid (N) antigen of SARS-CoV-2 by electrochemiluminescence-based immunoassay (ECLIA).
Results: The detection of IgM against the RBD of the spike protein by rapid kit was less sensitive and less specific for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, diagnostic efficacy of IgG by rapid kit was highly sensitive and specific when compared with the total antibody against N antigen measured by ECLIA.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that detection of IgM against the RBD of S protein by rapid kit is less effective, but IgG detection can be used as an effective diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in real-life hospital setting.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; chemiluminescence analysis; rapid antibody tests for COVID-19; receptor-binding domain (RBD); spike surface glycoprotein.
Copyright © 2022 Irungbam, Chitkara, Singh, Sonkar, Dubey, Bansal, Shrivastava, Goswami, Manchanda, Saxena, Saxena, Garg, Husain, Talukdar, Kumar and Koner.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Serological testing for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in clinical practice: A comparative diagnostic accuracy study.Allergy. 2022 Jul;77(7):2090-2103. doi: 10.1111/all.15206. Epub 2022 Jan 11. Allergy. 2022. PMID: 34986501 Free PMC article.
-
Simultaneous Measurement of IgM and IgG Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 Spike, RBD, and Nucleocapsid Multiplexed in a Single Assay on the xMAP INTELLIFLEX DR-SE Flow Analyzer.Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):e0250721. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02507-21. Epub 2022 Apr 7. Microbiol Spectr. 2022. PMID: 35389244 Free PMC article.
-
Development of robust, indigenous ELISA for detection of IgG antibodies against CoV-2 N and S proteins: mass screening.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022 Sep;106(18):6225-6238. doi: 10.1007/s00253-022-12113-8. Epub 2022 Aug 17. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 35976427 Free PMC article.
-
[What Is an Antibody Test? Characteristics of Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and Their Tests].Yakugaku Zasshi. 2022;142(6):611-618. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.21-00234-2. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2022. PMID: 35650081 Review. Japanese.
-
Prospects of NIR fluorescent nanosensors for green detection of SARS-CoV-2.Sens Actuators B Chem. 2022 Jul 1;362:131764. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2022.131764. Epub 2022 Mar 30. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2022. PMID: 35370362 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy Tests of COVID-19.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 26;13(9):1549. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091549. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37174941 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development and optimization of an in-house heterologous ELISA for detection of prednisolone drug in enzyme conjugates using spacers.Front Immunol. 2023 Aug 22;14:1200328. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1200328. eCollection 2023. Front Immunol. 2023. PMID: 37675116 Free PMC article.
-
Alkhumra Hemorrhagic Fever Virus (AHFV): A Concise Overview.Yale J Biol Med. 2024 Dec 19;97(4):505-514. doi: 10.59249/QSPC8835. eCollection 2024 Dec. Yale J Biol Med. 2024. PMID: 39703604 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Dubey A., Bansal A., Sonkar S. C., Goswami B., Makwane N., Manchanda V., et al. (2020). In–house assembled protective devices in laboratory safety against SARS-nCoV-2 in clinical biochemistry laboratory of a COVID dedicated hospital. medRxiv [Preprint] medRxiv 2020 08.24.20155713 10.1101/2020.08.24.20155713 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous