Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987 May;248(2):399-407.
doi: 10.1007/BF00218208.

Determination of the numerical density of perforated synapses in rat neocortex

Determination of the numerical density of perforated synapses in rat neocortex

R K Calverley et al. Cell Tissue Res. 1987 May.

Abstract

The numerical density and frequency of perforated synapses in the molecular layer of rat parietal cortex have been determined using 4 procedures in an attempt to overcome problems associated with the size and complex three-dimensional shape of perforated synapses. The following procedures were compared: A, single-section analysis; B, adjacent-section analysis; C, semi-serial-section analysis; and D, complete serial-section analysis. All procedures made use of an unbiased counting rule. Estimates of the numerical density of perforated synapses ranged from 0.06 to 0.27 X 10(9) mm-3, and that of all synapses (non-perforated and perforated) from 1.88 to 2.50 X 10(9) mm-3. The frequency of perforated synapses varied from 4.5 to 18.0%. Procedures B (adjacent-section analysis) and D (complete serial-section analysis), neither of which utilize assumptions regarding the shape of synapses, produced comparable results (numerical density of perforated synapses 0.19-0.27 X 10(9) mm-3, and of all synapses 2.24-2.45 X 10(9) mm-3; frequency of perforated synapses 8.6-10.9%). The frequency of perforated synapses appeared to be underestimated by procedure A (single section analysis; 4.5%) and overestimated by C (semi-serial section analysis; 18%). It is concluded that adjacent-section analysis is the most efficient and effective procedure for determining the numerical density and frequency of complex particles, such as perforated synapses. There is, however, no significant difference in the performance of this procedure compared with that of single-section analysis, for determining the numerical density of synapses in general. Nevertheless, inherent problems of bias within the single-section procedure make the adjacent section method the procedure of choice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Microsc. 1983 Sep;131(Pt 3):355-60 - PubMed
    1. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1969 Sep 22;100(4):487-506 - PubMed
    1. Prog Brain Res. 1982;55:195-203 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jun;80(11):3517-21 - PubMed
    1. Brain Res. 1980 Feb 17;184(1):23-40 - PubMed

Publication types