Evaluation of Computed Tomography Scoring Systems in the Prediction of Short-Term Mortality in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients from a Low- to Middle-Income Country
- PMID: 35558729
- PMCID: PMC9081064
- DOI: 10.1089/neur.2021.0067
Evaluation of Computed Tomography Scoring Systems in the Prediction of Short-Term Mortality in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients from a Low- to Middle-Income Country
Abstract
The present study aims to evaluate the accuracy of the prognostic discrimination and prediction of the short-term mortality of the Marshall computed tomography (CT) classification and Rotterdam and Helsinki CT scores in a cohort of TBI patients from a low- to middle-income country. This is a post hoc analysis of a previously conducted prospective cohort study conducted in a university-associated, tertiary-level hospital that serves a population of >12 million in Brazil. Marshall CT class, Rotterdam and Helsinki scores, and their components were evaluated in the prediction of 14-day and in-hospital mortality using Nagelkerk's pseudo-R 2 and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Multi-variate regression was performed using known outcome predictors (age, Glasgow Coma Scale, pupil response, hypoxia, hypotension, and hemoglobin values) to evaluate the increase in variance explained when adding each of the CT classification systems. Four hundred forty-seven patients were included. Mean age of the patient cohort was 40 (standard deviation, 17.83) years, and 85.5% were male. Marshall CT class was the least accurate model, showing pseudo-R 2 values equal to 0.122 for 14-day mortality and 0.057 for in-hospital mortality, whereas Rotterdam CT scores were 0.245 and 0.194 and Helsinki CT scores were 0.264 and 0.229. The AUC confirms the best prediction of the Rotterdam and Helsinki CT scores regarding the Marshall CT class, which presented greater discriminative ability. When associated with known outcome predictors, Marshall CT class and Rotterdam and Helsinki CT scores showed an increase in the explained variance of 2%, 13.4%, and 21.6%, respectively. In this study, Rotterdam and Helsinki scores were more accurate models in predicting short-term mortality. The study denotes a contribution to the process of external validation of the scores and may collaborate with the best risk stratification for patients with this important pathology.
Keywords: CT scoring; prognostic models; traumatic brain injury.
© Matheus Rodrigues de Souza et al., 2022; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Yao, S., Song, J., Li, S., Cao, C., Fang, L., Wang, C., and Xu, G. (2017). Helsinki computed tomography scoring system can independently predict long-term outcome in traumatic brain injury. World Neurosurg. 101, 528–533. - PubMed
-
- Souza, M.R. de, Fagundes, C.F., Sobrinho, O.P.da C., Ribeiro, D.G., Muniz, J.P.C., Campos, L.A.S., Araujo, M.F., Padilha, A.H., Alves, F. de O., Baschirotto, V.P., Silva, O.S.A., and Cortês, M.A. (2019). Analysis of anatomical lesions and epidemiological study in violent deaths caused by traumatic brain injury. Brazilian J. os Neurosurg. Free Themes, 87.
-
- De Almeida, C.E.R., De Sousa Filho, J.L., Dourado, J.C., Gontijo, P.A.M., Dellaretti, M.A., and Costa, B.S. (2016). Traumatic brain injury epidemiology in Brazil. World Neurosurg. 87, 540–547. - PubMed
-
- Jacobs, B., Beems, T., Stulemeijer, M., Van Vugt, A.B., Van Der Vliet, T.M., Borm, G.F., and Vos, P.E. (2010). Outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury: age and clinical variables are stronger predictors than CT abnormalities. J. Neurotrauma 27, 655–668. - PubMed
-
- Maas, A.I.R., Steyerberg, E.W., Butcher, I., Dammers, R., Lu, J., Marmarou, A., Mushkudiani, N.A., McHugh, G.S., and Murray, G.D. (2007). Prognostic value of computerized tomography scan characteristics in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J. Neurotrauma 24, 303–314. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources