Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 8;3(1):39-46.
doi: 10.1089/pmr.2021.0082. eCollection 2022.

Development and Validation of the Death Pronouncement Burden Scale for Oncology Practice

Yusuke Hiratsuka  1   2 , Mitsunori Miyashita  3 , Yu Uneno  4 , Kiyohumi Oya  5 , Soichiro Okamoto  6 , Takaomi Kessoku  7 , Hironori Mawatari  8 , Shunsuke Oyamada  9 , Junko Nozato  10 , Keita Tagami  1 , Akira Inoue  1
Affiliations

Development and Validation of the Death Pronouncement Burden Scale for Oncology Practice

Yusuke Hiratsuka et al. Palliat Med Rep. .

Abstract

Background: Informing families of a patient's death is one of the most challenging responsibilities of clinicians who provide care for terminally ill patients. Although death pronouncement can be a highly stressful event for clinicians, no previous study has reported qualitative characteristics of the burden experienced by clinicians related to death pronouncements. Moreover, no scale has been developed to assess this burden.

Objective: This study sought to develop a scale to evaluate clinicians' burden related to death pronouncement (Death Pronouncement Burden Scale for oncology practice [DPBS-oncol]) and examine its reliability and validity in Japan.

Methods: We presented the DPBS-oncol to clinicians involved in oncology practice and examined its reliability and discriminant validity. To investigate the test-retest reliability of the scale, the DPBS-oncol was presented a second time to a subsample of the clinicians.

Results: Factor analysis required a grouping of the 15 DPBS-oncol items into one factor. Cronbach's α coefficient of the total score of DPBS-oncol was 0.94, and the intraclass correlation coefficient of the total score of DPBS-oncol was 0.89. Regarding discriminant validity, DPBS-oncol total score was moderately correlated with other available scales for assessing clinicians' attitudes to end-of-life care.

Conclusion: This study was the first to develop a scale to evaluate clinicians' burden related to death pronouncement. The DPBS-oncol, which includes 15 items, was validated and shown to have sufficient reliability.

Keywords: assessment instrument; clinician's burden; death pronouncement; oncology practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Kusakabe A, Nozato J, Hirano K, et al. : Guidebook on doctors' behaviors for death diagnosis created by community healthcare providers changed residents' mind for death diagnosis. J Palliat Care 2020;25:825859720951698. - PubMed
    1. Hallenbeck J: Palliative care in the final days of life: “They were expecting it at any time.” JAMA 2005;293:2265–2271. - PubMed
    1. Fraser HC, Kutner JS, and Pfeifer MP: Senior medical students' perceptions of the adequacy of education on end-of-life issues. J Palliat Med 2001;4:337–343. - PubMed
    1. Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, et al. : Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA 2000;284:2476–2482. - PubMed
    1. Bailey FA, and Williams BR: Preparation of residents for death pronouncement: A sensitive and supportive method. Palliat Support Care 2005;3:107–114. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources