Quality of acute asthma care: an audit of clinical practice in a Victorian health service
- PMID: 35559590
- DOI: 10.1111/imj.15820
Quality of acute asthma care: an audit of clinical practice in a Victorian health service
Abstract
Background: Gaps in the treatment of patients with acute asthma have been repeatedly described in Australia. We conducted a retrospective audit of acute asthma care at a Victorian tertiary institution.
Aims: To describe acute asthma care at a large health network in metropolitan Melbourne, and evaluate the extent to which Emergency Department (ED) care was consistent with National Asthma Council guidelines.
Methods: A retrospective audit was performed of medical records between July 2017 and June 2019. We included adult patients admitted to campuses within the Western Health network in Melbourne, Victoria, where the length of stay was at least 12 h, and the primary discharge diagnosis was asthma.
Results: Four hundred and ninety-three admissions were included in the analysis, representing 392 individual patients. Seventy-one percent of patients were female and 27% were current smokers. Ninety-six percent of patients had a prior asthma diagnosis, 63% had a previous hospital presentation and 75% were prescribed an inhaled preventer. In the ED, systemic corticosteroids and inhaled salbutamol were prescribed in 65% and 82% admissions respectively; adjunctive treatments included ipratropium (67% of admissions), magnesium sulfate (30%), adrenaline (11%) and non-invasive ventilation (9%). Overall, ED care was guideline concordant in 59% of admissions. On the wards, treatments prescribed within 24 h of admission included corticosteroids (90% of admissions), salbutamol (84%), ipratropium (64%) and inhaled preventers (63%). The proportion of patients prescribed these treatments, as well as documented follow up (e.g. asthma action plans), varied significantly depending on the treating specialty.
Conclusion: The emergency treatment of patients with acute asthma frequently deviated from guidelines and there was significant variation in inpatient treatment. Quality improvement initiatives that incorporate structural changes are required to improve asthma care.
Keywords: asthma; guideline; quality improvement.
© 2022 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.
References
-
- National Asthma Council Australia. Australian Asthma Handbook, Version 2.0. Melbourne: National Asthma Council Australia; 2019 [cited 2021 Sep 18]. Available from URL: http://www.asthmahandbook.org.au
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Asthma. Cat. no. ACM 33. Canberra: AIHW; 2020 [updated 2020 Aug 25; cited 2021 Sep 18]. Available from URL: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/chronic-respiratory-conditions/asthma
-
- Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. 2020 [cited 2021 Sep 18]. Available from URL: www.ginasthma.org
-
- Schatz M, Kazzi AAN, Brenner B, Camargo CA, Corbridge T, Krishnan JA et al. Managing asthma exacerbations in the emergency department: summary of the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Expert Panel Report 3 guidelines for the management of asthma exacerbations. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2009; 6: 353-6.
-
- Gibson PG, Talbot PI, Hancock J, Hensley MJ. A prospective audit of asthma management following emergency asthma treatment at a teaching hospital. Med J Aust 1993; 158: 775-8.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical