Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun:28:100275.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2021.100275. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

Cancer genetic testing in marginalized groups during an era of evolving healthcare reform

Affiliations
Review

Cancer genetic testing in marginalized groups during an era of evolving healthcare reform

Stephen M Modell et al. J Cancer Policy. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The Affordable Care Act and subsequent reforms pose tradeoffs for racial-ethnic, rural, and sex-related groups in the United States experiencing disparities in BRCA1/2 genetic counseling and testing and colorectal cancer screening, calling for policy changes.

Methods: A working group of the American Public Health Association Genomics Forum Policy Committee engaged in monthly meetings to examine ongoing literature and identify policy alternatives in the coverage of cancer genetic services for marginalized groups. 589 items were collected; 408 examined. Efforts continued from February 2015 through September 2020.

Results: African Americans and Latinos have shown 7-8 % drops in uninsured rates since the Exchanges opened. The ACA has increased BRCA1/2 test availability while several disparities remain, including by sex. Rural testing and screening utilization rates have improved. Medicaid expansion and the inclusion of Medicare in the ACA have resulted in mixed improvements in colorectal cancer screening rates in marginalized groups.

Conclusion: Cancer genetic testing and screening to date have only partially benefited from healthcare reforms. Sensitivity to cost concerns and further monitoring of emerging data are needed. A reduction in disparities depends on the availability of private insurance, Medicaid and Medicare to the marginalized. Attention to value-based design and the way cancer benefits are translated into actual testing and screening are crucial.

Policy summary: The findings suggest the need for further benefits-related health agency interpretation of and amendments to the ACA, continued Medicaid and innovative Medicare expansion, and incorporation of cancer services values-based considerations at several levels, aimed at reducing group disparities.

Keywords: African Americans; Breast cancer; Colorectal cancer; Early detection of cancer; Genetic testing; Health care reform; Hispanic Americans; Rural population; Sex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest

No competing financial interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chokshi N, Historians Take Note: What America Looked Like Before Obamacare [Accessed January 16, 2020];March 26, Washington Post, 2014, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2014/03/26/historians-tak....
    1. Moonesinghe R, Zhu J, Truman BI, Health insurance coverage – United States, 2004 and 2008, MMWR 60 (1 Suppl) (2011) 35–37. - PubMed
    1. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub Law 111–148, 124 Stat 119–111th U.S. Congress, 2010.
    1. Tuohy CH, Political accommodations in multipayer health care systems: implications for the United States, Am. J. Public Health 109 (11) (2019) 1501–1505. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goldman AL, Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU, et al., Out-of-pocket spending and premium contributions after implementation of the Affordable Care Act, JAMA Intern. Med 178 (3) (2018) 347–355. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types