Ex situ breeding programs benefit from science-based cooperative management
- PMID: 35560574
- DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21700
Ex situ breeding programs benefit from science-based cooperative management
Abstract
Science-based management confers a variety of benefits to wildlife populations that are cooperatively managed by zoos and aquariums, including those managed through the Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Briefly, when management strategies are successful, they result in reproductively robust populations that better retain genetic diversity and limit inbreeding than unmanaged populations. Although the benefits of demographic and genetic management have been well documented throughout both the scientific and popular literature, it has also been established that the majority of managed populations in zoos and aquariums are not meeting the minimum criteria believed to convey long-term biological viability. For most of these populations, an inability to meet viability criteria is not an inherent failure of how cooperative management is implemented. Furthermore, in recent years, we have perceived that the need to meet specific viability goals sometimes has obscured the benefits that these populations receive from rigorous, science-based management. To better clarify the conversation surrounding population viability in zoos and aquariums, we seek to decouple viability measures and how they predict population persistence from the benefits conferred to populations through science-based management. A primary goal of population management is to facilitate the persistence of priority species for longer than would be expected if no such management were implemented. Although current viability measures and future projections of viability are important tools for assessing the likelihood of population persistence, they are not indicators of which populations may most benefit from science-based management. Here, we review the history and purpose of applying science-based management to zoo and aquarium populations, describe measures of population viability and caution against confusing those measures of viability with population management goals or long-term population sustainability, and clearly articulate the benefits conferred to zoo and aquarium populations by science-based management.
Keywords: ex situ; population management; sustainability; viability.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Allard, R., Willis, K., Lees, C., Smith, B., & Hiddinga, B. (2010). Regional collection planning for mammals. Wild mammals in captivity: Principles and techniques for zoo management (pp. 253-262). University of Chicago Press.
-
- Baker, A., Lacy, R. C., Leus, K., & Traylor-Holzer, K. (2011). Intensive management of populations for conservation. WAZA Magazine, 12, 40-43.
-
- Ballou, J., & Traylor-Holzer, K. (2011). Captive populations and genetic sustainability. WAZA Magazine, 12, 19-22.
-
- Ballou, J. D. (1997). Ancestral inbreeding only minimally affects inbreeding depression in mammalian populations. Journal of Heredity, 88(3), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhe
-
- Ballou, J. D., & Foose, T. J. (1996). Demographic and genetic management of captive populations. In D. G. Kleiman, M. E. Allen, K. V. Thompson, & S. (Eds.), Wild mammals in captivity: Principles and techniques 1st Edition, (p. 219). The University of Chicago Press.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
