Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;133(5):1036-1043.
doi: 10.1002/lary.30155. Epub 2022 May 13.

Intranasal Spray Characteristics for Best Drug Delivery in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Affiliations

Intranasal Spray Characteristics for Best Drug Delivery in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Carson Popper et al. Laryngoscope. 2023 May.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine parameter combinations for effective drug delivery of intranasal spray steroids to the ostiomeatal complex (OMC) and maxillary sinus (MS) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

Methods: Each patient's sinonasal cavity was reconstructed from computed tomography scans. Intranasal airflow and drug particle transport were simulated using computational fluid dynamic modeling. Airflow simulations were performed at 15 Pascal inhalation pressure. Intranasal spray particles of 1-100 μm were simulated at release speeds of 1, 5, and 10 m/s from 6 release locations (Bottom, Center, Top, Lateral, Lateral-Bottom, and Lateral-Top) at a nozzle insertion depth of 15 mm. Drug delivery simulations were performed in the head tilted forward position.

Results: Maximal OMC deposition was 0.78%-12.44%, while maximal MS deposition was 0.02%-1.03% across all simulations. In general, particles between 6 and 10 μm had the best OMC (at 1 m/s particle velocity) and MS (at 10 m/s particle velocity) deposition. Particles ranging from 21 to 30 μm also had superior OMC deposition. The lateral and lateral-top spray release locations produced maximum OMC deposition, but no one release location demonstrated an increase in MS deposition.

Conclusion: This preliminary study suggests that it is challenging to determine a common set of intranasal spray parameter combinations for effective drug delivery to the OMC and MSs. Although drug particle size and spray particle velocity seem to impact particle deposition patterns, spray release location appears to vary with anatomical differences between subjects, particularly when the MS is the target location for particle deposition. Laryngoscope, 133:1036-1043, 2023.

Keywords: chronic rhinosinusitis; computational fluid dynamics; drug delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This research was supported in part by the National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01DE028554. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Coronal views from CT scans of all patients. A. Subject 1, B. Subject 2, C. Subject 3, D. Subject 4, E. Subject 5. F. Schematic diagram of the sinonasal airway.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Drug particle deposition on each side in A. MS, and B. OMC
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Particle deposition in the paranasal airway by release location.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Deposition by particle size group. A. Subject 1 MS, B. Subject 1 OMC, C. Subject 2 MS, D. Subject 2 OMC. (G01=1–5 microns, G02=6–10 microns, G03=11–20 microns, G04=21–30 microns, G05=31–40 microns, G06=41–50 microns, G07=51–60 microns, G08=61–70 microns, G09=71–80 microns, G10=81–90 microns, G11=91–100 microns)
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Deposition by particle size group. A. Subject 3 OMC, B. Subject 5 OMC, C. Subject 4 MS, D. Subject 4 OMC. Note Subjects 3 and 5 had zero MS deposition and were not displayed on the plot. (G01=1–5 microns, G02=6–10 microns, G03=11–20 microns, G04=21–30 microns, G05=31–40 microns, G06=41–50 microns, G07=51–60 microns, G08=61–70 microns, G09=71–80 microns, G10=81–90 microns, G11=91–100 microns)

References

    1. Fokkens WJ, et al., European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2020. Rhinology, 2020. 58: p. I–+. - PubMed
    1. Frank Dennis O, Z. AM, Dhandha Vishal H, McKinney Kibwei A, Fleischman Gitanjali M, Ebert Charles S Jr, Senior Brent A, Kimbell Julia S, Quantification of airflow into the maxillary sinuses before and after functional endoscopic sinus surgery. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, 2013. 3(10): p. 834–840. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rudmik L, et al. Defining appropriateness criteria for endoscopic sinus surgery during management of uncomplicated adult chronic rhinosinusitis: a RAND/UCLA appropriateness study. in International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology. 2016. Wiley Online Library. - PubMed
    1. Chong LY, et al., Saline irrigation for chronic rhinosinusitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016(4). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chong LY, et al., Intranasal steroids versus placebo or no intervention for chronic rhinosinusitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016(4). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances