Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 30;23(9):5022.
doi: 10.3390/ijms23095022.

MicroRNA-20a-5p Downregulation by Atorvastatin: A Potential Mechanism Involved in Lipid-Lowering Therapy

Affiliations

MicroRNA-20a-5p Downregulation by Atorvastatin: A Potential Mechanism Involved in Lipid-Lowering Therapy

Kathleen Saavedra et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

The treatment of hypercholesterolemia is mainly based on statins. However, the response to pharmacological therapy shows high inter-individual variability, resulting in variable effects in both lipid lowering and risk reduction. Thus, a better understanding of the lipid-lowering mechanisms and response variability at the molecular level is required. Previously, we demonstrated a deregulation of the microRNA expression profile in HepG2 cells treated for 24 h with atorvastatin, using a microarray platform. In the present study, we evaluated the expression of hsa-miR-17-5p, hsa-miR-20a-5p and hsa-miR-106a-5p in hypercholesterolemic patients before and after atorvastatin treatment and in HepG2 cells treated for 24 h with atorvastatin The miRNA hsa-mir-20a-5p was repressed after atorvastatin treatment in hypercholesteremic subjects and in HepG2 cells in culture. Repression of hsa-mir-20a-5p increased LDLR gene and protein expression in HepG2 cells, while hsa-mir-20a-5p overexpression reduced LDLR gene and protein expression.

Keywords: atorvastatin; cardiovascular diseases; hypercholesterolemia; microRNA; statin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relative expression of miRNAs in hypercholesteremic patients treated with atorvastatin. (a) hsa-miR-17-5p, (b) hsa-miR-20a-5p and (c) hsa-miR-106a-5p. The relative expression was determined by RT-qPCR from enriched RNA extracted from leukocyte cells in the peripheral blood of hypercholesteremic patients before and after atorvastatin treatment (20 mg/day/4 weeks). Normalization was performed using hsa-miR-191 as a reference gene; p-value was obtained by paired t-test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative expression of miRNAs in HepG2 cells treated with ATV 10 μM. Gene expression analysis of miRNAs hsa-miR-17-5p, hsa-miR-20a-5p and hsa-miR-106a-5p in control cells, vehicle-treated cells (methanol 0.1%) and cells treated with 10 μM ATV. * p = 0.0456 *** p < 0.0001 by unpaired t-test when compared with vehicle-treated cells (methanol 0.1%). The experiments were performed in technical and biological triplicates. ATV: atorvastatin.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Binding sites for the miRNA hsa-miR-20a-5p in the 3′UTR region of LDLR. The 3′UTR region of LDLR in humans has two predicted and conserved binding sites for hsa-miR-20a-5p. The seed sequence of hsa-miR-20a-5p is shown in red, while its respective complementary region in the 3′UTR is shown in blue. Conserved sites between species are shown below: hsa, human; ptr, chimpanzee; mmu, mouse; rno, rat. LDLR: low-density lipoprotein receptor; UTR: untranslated region.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Post-transcriptional regulation of LDLR expression by hsa-miR-20a-5p in HepG2 cells. (a) LDLR gene expression analysis by RT-qPCR in HepG2 cells transfected with a negative control mimic (NC) or an hsa-miR-20a-5p mimic. (b) Gene expression analysis of LDLR by RT-qPCR in HepG2 cells transfected with a negative control inhibitor (NC) or an hsa-miR-20a-5p inhibitor. (c) LDLR protein expression analysis by western blot (representative image) of LDLR in HepG2 cells transfected with a negative control mimic (NC) or an hsa-miR-20a-5p mimics. (d) LDLR protein expression analysis by western blot (representative image) of LDLR in HepG2 cells transfected with a negative control inhibitor (NC) or an hsa-miR-20a-5p inhibitor. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.0001, compared to cells treated with negative control mimics or the inhibitor as appropriate, by unpaired t-test. The experiments were performed in technical and biological triplicates.

References

    1. Mathers C.D., Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Castelli W.P., Anderson K., Wilson P.W., Levy D. Lipids and risk of coronary heart disease. The Framingham Study. Ann. Epidemiol. 1992;2:23–28. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(92)90033-M. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coombs J.H., Cornish L., Hiller P., Smith D.G. Compliance and refill pattern behavior with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors after acute myocardial infarction. Manag. Care Interface. 2002;15 - PubMed
    1. Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2012;32:2045–2051. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179705. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Libby P., Okamoto Y., Rocha V.Z., Folco E. Inflammation in atherosclerosis: Transition from theory to practice. Circ. J. 2010;74:213–220. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-09-0706. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms