Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 20;19(9):5019.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095019.

Analysis of Factors Influencing Polish Students' Opinions on Euthanasia

Affiliations

Analysis of Factors Influencing Polish Students' Opinions on Euthanasia

Iga Stokłosa et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Due to the continuous development of palliative care and methods of pain relief in the last moments of patients’ lives, we are faced with the question of how long we should take measures to delay inevitable death for, without providing prolonged therapy against the patient’s will. For terminally ill and people experiencing unimaginable suffering, euthanasia is considered as one of the possible options for a dignified farewell. The aim of the study was to determine the views on euthanasia in a group of students from Polish universities. Questionnaire responses were analyzed for 9686 students (79.9% of women and 20.1% of men) aged 18−35 years. Respondents were asked to complete their own questionnaire on demographic data and attitudes toward euthanasia in the case of severe terminal illness or paralysis preventing independent living. Euthanasia was significantly more acceptable among women (85% vs. 75%, p < 0.0001; 69% vs. 62%, p < 0.0001) and non-believers [98% vs. 97% (denominations other than Christian), 84% (other forms of Christianity), 69% (Roman Catholic); p < 0.0001] in every case considered. Religious affiliation was the factor that most influenced attitudes toward euthanasia. Among the other elements influencing attitudes toward euthanasia, residence and field of study were distinguished. Considering the large sample size and specific conclusions, the article should be an important argument in the discussion on euthanasia.

Keywords: death; ethics; euthanasia; public health; students.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Varkey B. Defining Euthanasia and the Need to be Circumspect in the Usage of the Term. Med. Princ. Pract. 2020;29:499–500. doi: 10.1159/000508791. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Śmigacz K. Concepts and types of euthanasia; Proceedings of the 3rd Student Scientific Conference of the University of Law and Administration in Rzeszów; Rzeszów, Poland. 3 July 2015.
    1. American Medical Association Opinion 5.7 Physician-assisted suicide Code of Medical Ethics: American Medical Association. [(accessed on 9 April 2022)]. Available online: https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/physician-assisted-suicide.
    1. Bliźniewska-Kowalska K.M., Talarowska M., Szewczyk A., Gałecki P. Assisted suicide: Ethical and legal problem. Psychiatria. 2019;16:44–49.
    1. Cohen J., Van Landeghem P., Carpentier N., Deliens L. Public acceptance of euthanasia in Europe: A survey study in 47 countries. Int. J. Public Health. 2013;59:143–156. doi: 10.1007/s00038-013-0461-6. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources