Evaluation Method for Quality Risks of Safety in Prefabricated Building Construction Using SEM-SDM Approach
- PMID: 35564580
- PMCID: PMC9099468
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095180
Evaluation Method for Quality Risks of Safety in Prefabricated Building Construction Using SEM-SDM Approach
Abstract
The construction of prefabricated buildings is an effective and efficient approach to improving construction processes and productivity. However, there are practical problems in this approach, such as listing, safety risk levels, and quality control. This study aims to develop a systematic approach for determining the key factors affecting prefabricated building projects' quality and safety risk and assessing this risk. Based on the literature review, a structured questionnaire was distributed to 408 China-based construction organizations. Considering the factors of safety risk evaluation systems for construction, the safety risk model of prefabricated buildings is established and combined with structural equation modeling (SEM) and a system dynamic model (SDM). A detailed case study was conducted to verify the empirical findings. The results show that pre-construction, during-construction, and after-construction significantly influence the quality risk (from high to low). The final comprehensive score is 92.71, indicating that the construction safety of the residential building is generally controllable and the quality is guaranteed. Furthermore, the investment risk of such projects can be assessed using SEM and SDM. This study contributes to the literature by considering quality-risk-influencing factors in this field. Furthermore, the findings provide an understanding of implementation and quality risk control for prefabricated building projects and provide valuable information to departments in charge of improving the safety risk performance of such projects.
Keywords: prefabricated buildings; quality and safety; risk evaluation; structural equation modelling; system dynamic model.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Study of Occupational Safety Risks in Prefabricated Building Hoisting Construction Based on HFACS-PH and SEM.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 29;19(3):1550. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031550. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35162572 Free PMC article.
-
Analyzing Construction Workers' Unsafe Behaviors in Hoisting Operations of Prefabricated Buildings Using HAZOP.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 18;19(22):15275. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215275. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36429993 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Analysis on the hidden cost of prefabricated buildings based on FISM-BN.PLoS One. 2021 Jun 3;16(6):e0252138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252138. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34081711 Free PMC article.
-
SEM-Based Analysis of Carbon Emission Reduction Pathway Study during the Materialization Stage of Prefabricated Buildings: Evidence from Shenyang and Guiyang, China.J Environ Public Health. 2022 Sep 19;2022:9721446. doi: 10.1155/2022/9721446. eCollection 2022. J Environ Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36193402 Free PMC article.
-
Critical Success Factors of Safety Program Implementation in Construction Projects in Iraq.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 11;18(16):8469. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168469. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34444218 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Developing a risk framework for assembly construction based on stakeholder theory and structural equation modelling.PLoS One. 2024 May 6;19(5):e0301370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301370. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38709752 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation approach of prefabricated components based on multi-layer complex network model combined with improved topsis method.PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0322236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322236. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40333809 Free PMC article.
-
Identification and analysis of hoisting safety risk factors for IBS construction based on the AcciMap and cases study.Heliyon. 2023 Dec 12;10(1):e23587. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23587. eCollection 2024 Jan 15. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 38192814 Free PMC article.
-
Safety risk assessment of subway shield construction under-crossing a river using CFA and FER.Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 2;12:1279642. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1279642. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38371233 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Analyzing resilience influencing factors in the prefabricated building supply chain based on SEM-SD methodology.Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 29;14(1):17393. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65271-2. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39075145 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chen K., Xu G.Y., Xue F., Zhong R.Y., Liu D., Lu W.S. A physical, internet-enabled building information modeling system for prefabricated construction. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2017;31:349–361. doi: 10.1080/0951192X.2017.1379095. - DOI
-
- Wallbaum H., Ostermeyer Y., Salzer C., Escamilla E.Z. Indicator-based sustainability assessment tool for affordable housing construction technologies. Ecol. Indic. 2012;18:353–364. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.005. - DOI
-
- Li X.J. Research on investment risk influence factors of prefabricated building projects. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2020;26:599–613. doi: 10.3846/jcem.2020.12917. - DOI
-
- Chang Y.F., Ishii H. Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making approach to assessing the project quality management in the project. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2013;22:928–936. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.176. - DOI
-
- Zhao W.H. Discussion on the construction safety risk management of prefabricated residential buildings. Constr. Saf. 2017;5:13–15.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources