Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 27;19(9):5313.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095313.

Quantitative Methods to Detect Suicide and Self-Harm Clusters: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Quantitative Methods to Detect Suicide and Self-Harm Clusters: A Systematic Review

Ruth Benson et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Suicide and self-harm clusters exist in various forms, including point, mass, and echo clusters. The early identification of clusters is important to mitigate contagion and allocate timely interventions. A systematic review was conducted to synthesize existing evidence of quantitative analyses of suicide and self-harm clusters. Electronic databases including Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from date of inception to December 2020 for studies that statistically analyzed the presence of suicide or self-harm clusters. Extracted data were narratively synthesized due to heterogeneity among the statistical methods applied. Of 7268 identified studies, 79 were eligible for narrative synthesis. Most studies quantitatively verified the presence of suicide and self-harm clusters based on the scale of the data and type of cluster. A Poisson-based scan statistical model was found to be effective in accurately detecting point and echo clusters. Mass clusters are typically detected by a time-series regression model, although limitations exist. Recently, the statistical analysis of suicide and self-harm clusters has progressed due to advances in quantitative methods and geospatial analytical techniques, most notably spatial scanning software. The application of such techniques to real-time surveillance data could effectively detect emerging clusters and provide timely intervention.

Keywords: cluster detection; contagion; geospatial analysis; self-harm; suicide; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. O’Carroll P.W., Mercy J.A., Steward J.A. CDC recommendations for a community plan for the prevention and containment of suicide clusters. MMWR Supp. 1988;37:1–12. - PubMed
    1. Niedzwiedz C., Haw C., Hawton K., Platt S. The definition and epidemiology of clusters of suicidal behavior: A systematic review. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2014;44:569–581. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12091. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bohanna I. Suicide “contagion”: What we know and what we need to find out. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2013;185:861–862. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130678. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hazell P. Adolescent suicide clusters: Evidence, mechanisms, and prevention. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry. 1993;27:653–665. doi: 10.3109/00048679309075828. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gould M.S., Wallenstein S., Kleinman M. Time-space clustering of teenage suicide. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1990;131:71–78. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115487. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types