Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 4;19(9):5578.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095578.

Towards a Holistic Model Explaining Hearing Protection Device Use among Workers

Affiliations

Towards a Holistic Model Explaining Hearing Protection Device Use among Workers

Olivier Doutres et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Offering hearing protection devices (HPDs) to workers exposed to hazardous noise is a noise control strategy often used to prevent noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). However, HPDs are used incorrectly and inconsistently, which explains their limited efficiency. Numerous models based on social cognition theories identify the significant factors associated with inconsistent HPD use and aim to improve HPD training programs and to increase HPD use. However, these models do not detail (dis)comfort aspects originating from complex interactions between characteristics of the triad "environment/person/HPD" while these aspects are known to largely influence HPD (mis)use. This paper proposes a holistic model explaining HPD (mis)use, based on the integration of a comfort model adapted to HPDs into an existing behavioral model already developed for HPDs. The model also takes into account the temporal dimension, which makes it possible to capture the scope of change in HPD-related health behaviors. This holistic description of HPD use could be used as a tool for stakeholders involved in HPD use to effectively prevent NIHL among workers.

Keywords: comfort model; hearing protection device; noise-induced hearing loss prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HPD comfort model. Acronyms used in this figure: “Fitting/Positioning” phase (F), the “Interaction” phase (I), the “internal Human body effects” phase (H) and the “Perception” phase (P); Comfort (C), Discomfort (D) or feel Neutral (N); Hearing Protection Device (HPD), Field Attenuation Estimation System (FAES), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time-independent model of HPD use.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time-dependent holistic model of HPD use.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Berger E.H., Voix J. Hearing Protection Devices (Chapter 11) In: Meinke D.K., Berger E.H., Neitzel R.L., Driscoll D.P., Bright K., editors. The Noise Manual. 6th ed. AIHA Press; Falls Church, VA, USA: 2022.
    1. Tikka C., Verbeek J.H., Kateman E., Morata T.C., Dreschler W.A., Ferrite S. Interventions to Prevent Occupational Noise-induced Hearing Loss. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brennan-Jones C.G., Tao K.F.M., Tikka C., Morata T.C. Cochrane Corner: Interventions to Prevent Hearing Loss Caused by Noise at Work. Int. J. Audiol. 2020;59:1–4. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1633479. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tikka C., Verbeek J., Kateman E., Morata T.C., Dreschler W., Ferrite S. Cochrane Method for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Prevent Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss—Abridged. CoDAS. 2020;32:e20190127. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20192019127. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Groenewold M.R., Masterson E.A., Themann C.L., Davis R.R. Do Hearing Protectors Protect Hearing? Am. J. Ind. Med. 2014;57:1001–1010. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22323. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms