Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 4;19(9):5579.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095579.

Clinical Evaluation of the Optical Filter for Autofluorescence Glasses for Oral Cancer Curing Light Exposed (GOCCLES®) in the Management of Potentially Premalignant Disorders: A Retrospective Study

Affiliations

Clinical Evaluation of the Optical Filter for Autofluorescence Glasses for Oral Cancer Curing Light Exposed (GOCCLES®) in the Management of Potentially Premalignant Disorders: A Retrospective Study

Carlo Lajolo et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Any oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) must be regularly monitored through clinical examination to detect any possible malignant transformation. Conventional intraoral exams, however, can be difficult because these conditions may resemble benign lesions. For this reason, several non-invasive diagnostic technologies have been developed to help the clinician in detecting and distinguishing between cancerous and benign lesions. Epithelial dysplasia can be considered the most important predictor of malignant evolution. Therefore, in this study we aim to evaluate the ability of an optical filter for autofluorescence Glasses for Oral Cancer Curing Light Exposed (GOCCLES®) and of toluidine blue staining in identifying dysplastic areas in patients with OPMDs.

Methods: In this retrospective study, medical records, photographs and videos of 25 patients with oral lesions were analyzed. Forty-two biopsy samples in 25 patients with OPMDs and at least one suspicious oral mucosa lesion that were evaluated in white light, autofluorescence with optical filter GOCCLES®, toluidine blue staining and then biopsied with histopathological analysis were analyzed.

Results: The sensitivity and specificity for the autofluorescence evaluation with GOCCLES® for identifying dysplasia or carcinoma were 66% and 48%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 34% and 77%, respectively, and the accuracy was 53%. The sensitivity and specificity for toluidine blue staining were 91% and 68%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 55% and 95%, respectively, and the accuracy was 75%.

Conclusions: The optical filter for autofluorescence (GOCCLES®) and toluidine blue staining are simple, inexpensive, rapid and non-invasive procedures that can assist the clinician in distinguishing OPMDs from healthy mucosa but they are not able to distinguish benign and malignant lesions.

Keywords: autofluorescence; biopsy; dysplasia; oral cancer; oral potentially malignant disorders; retrospective study; toluidine blue.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The GOCCLES® clip (Glasses for Oral Cancer Curing Light Exposed Screening) medical device.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Roc Curve.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Clinical appearance, blue toluidine staining and autofluorescence analysis of three different lesions. Case 1 shows a lichenoid lesion in white light (A) considered non-suspicious at clinical examination, which was negative by blue toluidine staining (B) and autofluorescence visualization (C). The histopathologic analysis shows acanthosis, hyperparacheratosis, infiltrated lichenoid lymphocyte with vacuolization of the basal layer (D). Case 2 shows a suspicious red lesion (E), that was positive by blue toluidine staining (F) and autofluorescence visualization (G). Biopsy (H) revealed a condition of moderate dysplasia with areas of severe dysplasia. Case 3 shows a proliferative suspicious lesion (I) that was negative by blue toluidine staining (L) and autofluorescence visualizaion (M). The histopathologic diagnosis was a verrucous carcinoma (N).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Miranda-Filho A., Bray F. Global patterns and trends in cancers of the lip, tongue and mouth. Oral Oncol. 2020;102:104551. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104551. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The Global Cancer Observatory IARC. WHO lip, Oral Cavity Cancer. [(accessed on 22 April 2021)]. Available online: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/1-Lip-oral-cavity-fact...
    1. Warnakulasuriya S., Greenspan J.S. Textbook of oral cancer: Prevention, diagnosis and management. 1st ed. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2020.
    1. Romano A., Di Stasio D., Petruzzi M., Fiori F., Lajolo C., Santarelli A., Lucchese A., Serpico R., Contaldo M. Noninvasive imaging methods to improve the diagnosis of oral carcinoma and its precursors: State of the art and proposal of a three-step diagnostic process. Cancers. 2021;13:2864. doi: 10.3390/cancers13122864. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vonk J., de Wit J., Voskuil F.J., Witjes M.J.H. Improving oral cavity cancer diagnosis and treatment with fluorescence molecular imaging. Oral Dis. 2021;27:21–26. doi: 10.1111/odi.13308. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances