Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 8;19(9):5733.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095733.

Mat-O-Covid: Validation of a SARS-CoV-2 Job Exposure Matrix (JEM) Using Data from a National Compensation System for Occupational COVID-19

Affiliations

Mat-O-Covid: Validation of a SARS-CoV-2 Job Exposure Matrix (JEM) Using Data from a National Compensation System for Occupational COVID-19

Alexis Descatha et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Background. We aimed to assess the validity of the Mat-O-Covid Job Exposure Matrix (JEM) on SARS-CoV-2 using compensation data from the French National Health Insurance compensation system for occupational-related COVID-19. Methods. Deidentified compensation data for occupational COVID-19 in France were obtained between August 2020 and August 2021. The case acceptance was considered as the reference. Mat-O-Covid is an expert-based French JEM on workplace exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Bi- and multivariable models were used to study the association between the exposure assessed by Mat-O-Covid and the reference, as well as the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios. Results. In the 1140 cases included, there was a close association between the Mat-O-Covid index and the reference (p < 0.0001). The overall predictivity was good, with an AUC of 0.78 and an optimal threshold at 13 per thousand. Using Youden’s J statistic resulted in 0.67 sensitivity and 0.87 specificity. Both positive and negative likelihood ratios were significant: 4.9 [2.4−6.4] and 0.4 [0.3−0.4], respectively. Discussion. It was possible to assess Mat-O-Covid’s validity using data from the national compensation system for occupational COVID-19. Though further studies are needed, Mat-O-Covid exposure assessment appears to be accurate enough to be used in research.

Keywords: COVID-19; JEM; SARS-CoV-2; accuracy; compensation; job exposure matrix; occupational; predictivity; public health; validity; work.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operative characteristic curve. Mat-O-Covid data were compared to the health insurance decisions on compensation. The Youden’s J statistic illustrated the cut point.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Burdorf A., Porru F., Rugulies R. The COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic: Consequences for Occupational Health. Scand. J. Work. Environ. Health. 2020;46:229–230. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3893. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Billingsley S., Brandén M., Aradhya S., Drefahl S., Andersson G., Mussino E. COVID-19 Mortality across Occupations and Secondary Risks for Elderly Individuals in the Household: A Population Register-Based Study. Scand. J. Work. Environ. Health. 2022;48:52–60. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3992. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nafilyan V., Pawelek P., Ayoubkhani D., Rhodes S., Pembrey L., Matz M., Coleman M., Allemani C., Windsor-Shellard B., van Tongeren M., et al. Occupation and COVID-19 Mortality in England: A National Linked Data Study of 14.3 Million Adults. Occup. Environ. Med. 2021 doi: 10.1136/oemed-2021-107818. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fadel M., Salomon J., Descatha A. COVID-19 Job Exposure Matrix: From the Mat-O-Covid Design to Its Execution. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2021;63:e168. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002148. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Descatha A., Fadel M., Pitet S., Verdun-Esquer C., Esquirol Y., Legeay C., Dinh A., Clodore B., Duprat P., Cartégnie S., et al. SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Job Exposure Matrix: “Mat-O-Covid” Creation (COVID-Mate in French), accuracy study, and perspectives. Arch. Mal. Prof. Environ. 2021;82:487–493. doi: 10.1016/j.admp.2021.07.008. - DOI

Publication types