Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 20;27(9):2637.
doi: 10.3390/molecules27092637.

Quantification of Protein "Biomarkers" in Wheat-Based Food Systems: Dealing with Process-Related Issues

Affiliations

Quantification of Protein "Biomarkers" in Wheat-Based Food Systems: Dealing with Process-Related Issues

Mauro Marengo et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

Selected food proteins may represent suitable markers for assessing either the presence/absence of specific food ingredients or the type and intensity of food processes. A fundamental step in the quantification of any protein marker is choosing a proper protocol for solubilizing the protein of interest. This step is particularly critical in the case of solid foods and when the protein analyte is prone to undergo intermolecular disulfide exchange reactions with itself or with other protein components in the system as a consequence of process-induced unfolding. In this frame, gluten-based systems represent matrices where a protein network is present and the biomarker proteins may be either linked to other components of the network or trapped into the network itself. The protein biomarkers considered here were wheat gluten toxic sequences for coeliac (QQPFP, R5), wheat germ agglutinin (WGA), and chicken egg ovalbumin (OVA). These proteins were considered here in the frame of three different cases dealing with processes different in nature and severity. Results from individual cases are commented as for: (1) the molecular basis of the observed behavior of the protein; (2) the design of procedure aimed at improving the recovery of the protein biomarker in a form suitable for reliable identification and quantification; (3) a critical analysis of the difficulties associated with the plain transfer of an analytical protocol from one product/process to another. Proper respect for the indications provided by the studies exemplified in this study may prevent coarse errors in assays and vane attempts at estimating the efficacy of a given treatment under a given set of conditions. The cases presented here also indicate that recovery of a protein analyte often does not depend in a linear fashion on the intensity of the applied treatment, so that caution must be exerted when attributing predictive value to the results of a particular study.

Keywords: biomarkers; egg; food proteins; gluten; immunochemistry; lectin; ovalbumin; pasta; whole grain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effects of temperature during high hydrostatic pressure treatment (600 MPa, 10 min) of aqueous flour suspensions (40% solids). (A): protein solubility in 60% aqueous ethanol (full symbols) or 6M urea and 10 mM DTT (open symbols). (B): immunoreactivity of the proteins solubilized by individual extractants. (C): relative immunoreactivity of solubilized proteins. Symbols in the two upper panels are slightly larger than the standard deviation from quadruplicate measurements in duplicated experiments. Routines embedded in the graphical software SigmaPlot (rev. 10, Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA, USA) were used for data analysis and curve fitting.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting tracings for WGA extracts. The samples are identified as follows: markers (Mk); whole grain semolina (WGS); refined semolina (RS); fine millings (FM); coarse millings (CM). (A): Coomassie Blue staining; (B): Western blotting against commercial anti-WGA antibodies.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Senyuva H.Z., Jones I.B., Sykes M., Baumgartner S. A critical review of the specifications and performance of antibody and DNA-based methods for detection and quantification of allergens in foods. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2019;36:507–547. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2019.1579927. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Korte R., Oberleitner D., Brockmeyer J. Determination of food allergens by LC-MS: Impacts of sample preparation, food matrix, and thermal processing on peptide detectability and quantification. J. Proteom. 2019;196:131–140. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2018.11.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garcia-Calvo E., García-García A., Madrid R., Martin R., García T. From polyclonal sera to recombinant antibodies: A review of immunological detection of gluten in foodstuff. Foods. 2021;10:66. doi: 10.3390/foods10010066. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mattarozzi M., Careri M. The role of incurred materials in method development and validation to account for food processing effects in food allergen analysis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2019;411:4465–4480. doi: 10.1007/s00216-019-01642-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonomi F., Iametti S. Thiolomics of the Gluten Protein Network of Wheat Dough. In: Wrigley C., Corke H., Seetharaman K., Faubion J., editors. Encyclopedia of Food Grains 2: Nutrition and food grains. Volume 2. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2016. pp. 154–160.