Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 25;27(9):2755.
doi: 10.3390/molecules27092755.

The Potential Antidepressant Action of Duloxetine Co-Administered with the TAAR1 Receptor Agonist SEP-363856 in Mice

Affiliations

The Potential Antidepressant Action of Duloxetine Co-Administered with the TAAR1 Receptor Agonist SEP-363856 in Mice

Xia Ren et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

Here, we explored the possible interaction between duloxetine and SEP-363856 (SEP-856) in depression-related reactions. The results showed that oral administration of duloxetine showed powerful antidepressant-like effects in both the forced swimming test (FST) and the suspension tail test (TST). SEP-856 orally administered alone also exerted an antidepressant-like effect in FST and TST, especially at doses of 0.3, 1, and 10 mg/kg. In addition, duloxetine (15 mg/kg) and SEP-856 (15 mg/kg) both showed antidepressant-like effects in the sucrose preference test (SPT). Most importantly, in the above experiments, compared with duloxetine alone, the simultaneous use of duloxetine and SEP-856 caused a more significant antidepressant-like effect. It is worth noting that doses of drug combination in FST and TST did not change the motor activities of mice in the open-field test (OFT). Thus, duloxetine and SEP-856 seem to play a synergistic role in regulating depression-related behaviors and might be beneficial for refractory depression.

Keywords: SEP-363856; antidepressant-like effect; co-administration; depression; duloxetine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effects of duloxetine, SEP-856, and their co-administration on the FST in ICR mice. (A) Effects of duloxetine (3, 5, 7.5, and 10 mg/kg, p.o.) on behavioral despair in the FST 60 min after administration. (B) Effects of SEP-856 (0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg, p.o.) on behavioral despair in the FST 60 min after administration. (C) Effects of co-administration of duloxetine (3, 5, 7.5, and 10 mg/kg, p.o.) and SEP-856 (0.1 mg/kg, p.o.) on behavioral despair in the FST 60 after administration. Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM. from 4–8 mice and were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001 vs. vehicle. DLX, duloxetine.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effects of duloxetine, SEP-856, and their co-administration on the TST in ICR mice. (A) Effects of duloxetine (3, 5, 7.5, and 10 mg/kg, p.o.) on behavioral despair in the TST 60 min after administration. (B) Effects of SEP-856 (0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg, p.o.) on behavioral despair in the TST 60 min after administration. (C) Effects of co-administration of duloxetine (3, 5, 7.5, and 10 mg/kg, p.o.) and SEP-856 (0.1 mg/kg, p.o.) on behavioral despair in the TST 60 min after administration. Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM. from 4–8 mice and were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-hoc test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and **** p < 0.0001 vs. vehicle. DLX, duloxetine.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of administration of duloxetine (3, 5, 7.5, and 10 mg/kg) and SEP-856 (0.1 mg/kg) on the locomotor activity of ICR mice. The test was performed 60 min after administration. Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM. from 8 mice and were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test. DLX, duloxetine.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effects of duloxetine (15 mg/kg), SEP-856 (15 mg/kg), and their co-administration on the sucrose preference in the CUMS model of depression in ICR mice. Values are expressed as the means ± SEM from 5–7 mice and were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test. **** p < 0.0001 vs. NS-Veh; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 vs. CUMS-Veh. NS, non-stressed; CUMS, chronic unpredictable mild stress. DLX, duloxetine.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vijaya Kumar K., Rudra A., Sreedhara M.V., Siva Subramani T., Prasad D.S., Das M.L., Murugesan S., Yadav R., Trivedi R.K., Louis J.V., et al. Bacillus calmette-guerin vaccine induces a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-resistant depression like phenotype in mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 2014;42:204–211. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2014.06.205. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Podkowa K., Pilc A., Podkowa A., Salat K., Marciniak M., Palucha-Poniewiera A. The potential antidepressant action and adverse effects profile of scopolamine co-administered with the mGlu7 receptor allosteric agonist AMN082 in mice. Neuropharmacology. 2018;141:214–222. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.08.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lapidus K.A., Soleimani L., Murrough J.W. Novel glutamatergic drugs for the treatment of mood disorders. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2013;9:1101–1112. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S36689. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu Y., Ma L., Jiang W., Li Y., Wang G., Li R. Study of sex differences in duloxetine efficacy for depression in transgenic mouse models. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2017;11:344. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00344. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar R., Sinha V.R., Dahiya L., Sarwal A. Transdermal delivery of duloxetine-sulfobutylether-beta-cyclodextrin complex for effective management of depression. Int. J. Pharm. 2021;594:120129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.120129. - DOI - PubMed