Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 8;27(9):3028.
doi: 10.3390/molecules27093028.

Effect of Collagen Types, Bacterial Strains and Storage Duration on the Quality of Probiotic Fermented Sheep's Milk

Affiliations

Effect of Collagen Types, Bacterial Strains and Storage Duration on the Quality of Probiotic Fermented Sheep's Milk

Kamil Szopa et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

Collagen has become popular in dietary supplements, beverages and sports nutrition products. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of using various doses of collagen and collagen hydrolysate to produce probiotic sheep's milk fermented with Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus. The effects of storage time, type and dose of collagen, and different probiotic bacteria on the physicochemical, organoleptic and microbiological properties of fermented sheep's milk at 1 and 21 days of refrigerated storage were investigated. The addition of collagen to sheep's milk increased the pH value after fermentation and reduced the lactic acid contents of fermented milk compared to control samples. After fermentation, the number of probiotic bacteria cells was higher than 8 log cfu g-1. In sheep's milk fermented by L. acidophilus and L. casei, good survival of bacteria during storage was observed, and there was no effect of collagen dose on the growth and survival of both strains. The addition of collagen, both in the form of hydrolysate and bovine collagen, resulted in darkening of the color of the milk and increased the sweet taste intensity of the fermented sheep's milk. However, the addition of hydrolysate was effective in reducing syneresis in each milk sample compared to its control counterpart.

Keywords: bovine collagen; collagen hydrolysate; fermented sheep’s milk; probiotic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect of collagen addition on organoleptic parameters of milk fermented by L. casei after 1 and 21 days of cold storage. LC—control milk with Lacticaseibacillus casei; LC1.5W—milk with 1.5% collagen and Lacticaseibacillus casei; LC3.0W—milk with 3.0% collagen and Lacticaseibacillus casei; LC1.5H—milk with 1.5% collagen hydrolysate and Lacticaseibacillus casei; LC3.0H—milk with 3.0% collagen hydrolysate and Lacticaseibacillus casei.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of collagen addition on the organoleptic parameters of milk fermented by L. acidophilus after 1 and 21 days of cold storage. LA—control milk with Lactobacillus acidophilus; LA1.5W—milk with 1.5% collagen and Lactobacillus acidophilus; LA3.0W—milk with 3.0% collagen and Lactobacillus acidophilus; LA1.5H—milk with 1.5% collagen hydrolysate and Lactobacillus acidophilus; LA3.0H—milk with 3.0% collagen hydrolysate and Lactobacillus acidophilus.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of collagen addition on the organoleptic parameters of milk fermented by L. paracasei after 1 and 21 days of cold storage. LP—control milk with Lacticaseibacillus paracasei; LP1.5W—milk with 1.5% collagen and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei; LP3.0W—milk with 3.0% collagen and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei; LP1.5H—milk with 1.5% collagen hydrolysate and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei; LP3.0H—milk with 3.0% collagen hydrolysate and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of collagen addition on the organoleptic parameters of milk fermented by L. rhamnosus after 1 and 21 days of cold storage. LR—control milk with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus; LR1.5W—milk with 1.5% collagen and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus; LR3.0W—milk with 3.0% collagen and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus; LR1.5H—milk with 1.5% collagen hydrolysate and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus; LR3.0H—milk with 3.0% collagen hydrolysate and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Szajnar K., Znamirowska A., Kuźniar P. Sensory and textural properties of fermented milk with viability of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis Bb-12 and increased calcium concentration. Int. J. Food Prop. 2020;23:582–598. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2020.1748050. - DOI
    1. Tunick M.H., Van Hekken D.L. Dairy Products and health: Recent Insights. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015;63:9381–9388. doi: 10.1021/jf5042454. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kubiszewska I., Januszewska M., Rybka J., Gackowska L. Bakterie kwasu mlekowego i zdrowie: Czy probiotyki są bezpieczne dla człowieka? Lactic acid bacteria and health: Are probiotics safe for human? Postępy Hig. Med. Dośw. 2014;68:1325–1334. doi: 10.5604/17322693.1129120. (In Polish) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kuśmierska A., Fol M. Właściwości immunomodulacyjne i terapeutyczne drobnoustrojów probiotycznych. Immunomodulatory and therapeutic properties of probiotic microorganisms. Probl. Hig. Epidemiol. 2014;95:529–540. (In Polish)
    1. Zommiti M., Feuilloley M.G.J., Connil N. Update of Probiotics in Human World: A nonstop source of benefactions till the end of time. Microorganisms. 2020;8:1907. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8121907. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources