Myocardial Function during Ventilation with Lower versus Higher Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Patients without ARDS
- PMID: 35566435
- PMCID: PMC9104897
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092309
Myocardial Function during Ventilation with Lower versus Higher Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Patients without ARDS
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate whether lower PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure) had beneficial effects on myocardial function among intensive care unit (ICU) patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) compared to higher PEEP. In this pre-planned substudy of a randomized controlled trial (RELAx), comparing lower to higher PEEP, 44 patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography. The exclusion criteria were known poor left ventricular function and severe shock requiring high dosages of norepinephrine. To create contrast, we also excluded patients who received PEEP between 2 cmH2O and 7 cmH2O in the two randomization arms of the study. The primary outcome was the right ventricular myocardial performance index (MPI), a measure of systolic and diastolic function. The secondary outcomes included systolic and diastolic function parameters. A total of 20 patients were ventilated with lower PEEP (mean ± SD, 0 ± 1 cmH2O), and 24 patients, with higher PEEP (8 ± 1 cmH2O) (mean difference, -8 cmH2O; 95% CI: -8.1 to -7.9 cmH2O; p = 0.01). The tidal volume size was low in both groups (median (IQR), 7.2 (6.3 to 8.1) versus 7.0 (5.3 to 9.1) ml/kg PBW; p = 0.97). The median right ventricular MPI was 0.32 (IQR, 0.26 to 0.39) in the lower-PEEP group versus 0.38 (0.32 to 0.41) in the higher-PEEP group; the median difference was -0.03; 95% CI: -0.11 to 0.03; p = 0.33. The other systolic and diastolic parameters were similar. In patients without ARDS ventilated with a low tidal volume, a lower PEEP had no beneficial effects on the right ventricular MPI.
Keywords: ARDS; ICU; MPI; PEEP; mechanical ventilation; myocardial function.
Conflict of interest statement
Gama de Abreu reports the receipt of grants and personal fees from ZOLL and Drager Medical and personal fees from GE Healthcare and Ambu. Serpa Neto reports the receipt of lecture fees from Drager. Schultz reports receiving speakers’ fees and travel and lodging for a 2018 workshop organized by Hamilton. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Neto A.S., Simonis F.D., Barbas C.S.V., Biehl M., Determann R.M., Elmer J., Friedman G., Gajic O., Goldstein J.N., Linko R., et al. Lung-Protective Ventilation with Low Tidal Volumes and the Occurrence of Pulmonary Complications in Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Analysis. Crit. Care Med. 2015;43:2155–2163. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001189. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Neto A.S., Filho R.R., Cherpanath T., Determann R., Dongelmans D.A., Paulus F., Tuinman P.R., Pelosi P., De Abreu M.G., For the PROVE Network Investigators et al. Associations between positive end-expiratory pressure and outcome of patients without ARDS at onset of ventilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann. Intensiv. Care. 2016;6:109. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0208-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Peñuelas O., Muriel A., Abraira V., Frutos-Vivar F., Mancebo J., Raymondos K., Du B., Thille A.W., Ríos F., González M., et al. Inter-country variability over time in the mortality of mechanically ventilated patients. Intensiv. Care Med. 2020;46:444–453. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05867-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Writing Committee and Steering Committee for the RELAx Collaborative Group. Algera A.G., Pisani L., Neto A.S., Boer S.S.D., Bosch F.F.H., Bruin K., Klooster P.M., Van Der Meer N.J.M., Nowitzky R.O., et al. Effect of a Lower vs Higher Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Strategy on Ventilator-Free Days in ICU Patients Without ARDS: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2020;324:2509. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23517. - DOI - PMC - PubMed