Microbiologic Analysis of Removed Silicone Punctal Plugs in Dry Eye Patients
- PMID: 35566452
- PMCID: PMC9103617
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092326
Microbiologic Analysis of Removed Silicone Punctal Plugs in Dry Eye Patients
Abstract
This study analyzed the microbiologic results of removing silicone punctal plugs due to uncomfortable symptoms in dry-eye patients. Patients who were diagnosed with dry eye and received silicone punctal plugs-SuperEagle Punctum Plug™ (EagleVision, Denville, NJ, USA) or Parasol Punctum Plug™ (Beaver-Visitec international, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA)-into upper or lower puncta that were removed due to discomfort from January 2018 to June 2020 were enrolled and reviewed retrospectively. Out of the total 58 patients (64 eyes), 19 patients were male and 39 patients were female. Protrusion without granulation (21 patients, 32.8%) was the most common reason for plug removal, followed by protrusion with granuloma (19 patients, 29.7%). The positive rate of bacterial culture was 42.2% and Klebsiella aerogenes was the most common organism identified (18.5%). Vancomycin showed the highest susceptibility of 100% among all the antibiotics, third-generation cephalosporins were the most susceptible (88.5%) among cephalosporines, and levofloxacin was the most susceptible (81.0%) among quinolones. Among the patients who complained of discomfort after insertion of silicone punctal plugs, approximately 42% had a positive result in bacterial culture. Therefore, when removing punctal plugs in such patients, a microbiological examination may be needed for the appropriate selection of antibiotics.
Keywords: culture; dry eye; silicone punctal plug.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
The clinical efficacy of silicone punctal plug therapy.Cornea. 2002 Mar;21(2):135-9. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200203000-00001. Cornea. 2002. PMID: 11862081
-
Punctal Plug Retention Rates for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Dry Eye: A Randomized, Double-Masked, Controlled Clinical Trial.Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;160(2):238-242.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 May 18. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015. PMID: 25998003 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and tolerability outcomes after punctal occlusion with silicone plugs in dry eye syndrome.Am J Ophthalmol. 2001 Jan;131(1):30-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00620-6. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001. PMID: 11162976
-
[Study of change of size of the punctum before insertion and after extrusion of a punctal plug and selection of an appropriate plug for reinsertion].Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2005 May;109(5):274-8. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2005. PMID: 15948417 Review. Japanese.
-
Punctal occlusion for dry eye syndrome: summary of a Cochrane systematic review.Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar;103(3):301-306. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313267. Epub 2018 Oct 18. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 30337332
Cited by
-
Changes in the ocular surface microbiome of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Front Microbiol. 2024 Jul 8;15:1389139. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1389139. eCollection 2024. Front Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 39040901 Free PMC article.
-
Facile Modification of Medical-Grade Silicone for Antimicrobial Effectiveness and Biocompatibility: A Potential Therapeutic Strategy against Bacterial Biofilms.ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023 Oct 11;15(40):46626-46638. doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c08734. Epub 2023 Oct 2. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023. PMID: 37782835 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources