Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 29;11(9):2515.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11092515.

Methylene Blue Reduces Fluid Loading and Norepinephrine Requirements for Post-Resuscitation Syndrome in a Pig Model of Refractory Cardiac Arrest Resuscitated with Veno-Arterial ECMO

Affiliations

Methylene Blue Reduces Fluid Loading and Norepinephrine Requirements for Post-Resuscitation Syndrome in a Pig Model of Refractory Cardiac Arrest Resuscitated with Veno-Arterial ECMO

Benjamin Pequignot et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background: Refractory cardiac arrest management relies on extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), requiring the use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Circulatory flow recovery can be associated with an ischemia-reperfusion injury, leading to vasoplegia and vasopressor requirement. The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact on hemodynamics of a methylene blue bolus infusion in a porcine model of ischemic refractory cardiac arrest.

Methods: Ischemic refractory cardiac arrest was induced in 20 pigs. After a low flow period of 30 min, VA-ECMO was initiated and the pigs were randomly assigned to the standard care group (norepinephrine + crystalloids) or methylene blue group (IV 2 mg·kg-1 bolus of methylene blue over 30 min + norepinephrine and crystalloids). Macrocirculatory parameters and lactate clearance were measured. Sublingual microcirculation was evaluated with sidestream dark field (SDF) imaging. The severity of the ischemic digestive lesions was assessed according to the histologic Chiu/Park scale.

Results: Eighteen pigs were included. The total crystalloid load (5000 (6000-8000) mL vs. 17,000 (10,000-19,000) mL, p = 0.007, methylene blue vs. standard care group) and catecholamine requirements (0.31 (0.14-0.44) μg·kg-1·min-1 vs. 2.32 (1.17-5.55) μg·kg-1·min-1, methylene blue vs. standard care group, p = 0.004) were significantly reduced in the methylene blue group. There were no significant between-group differences in lactate clearance, sublingual capillary microvascular parameters assessed by SDF or histologic Chiu/Park scale.

Conclusions: In our refractory cardiac arrest porcine model treated with ECPR, methylene blue markedly reduced fluid loading and norepinephrine requirements in comparison to standard care during the first 6 h of VA-ECMO.

Keywords: advanced cardiac life support; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; inflammatory response; methylene blue; microcirculation; out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; vasopressor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Pr Levy received fees or grants from Abiomed, Gettinge, Orion, Amomed, Sanofi and Baxter.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Total crystalloid volume perfused (mL); (b) mean norepinephrine dose received over the 6 h of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation run (μg·kg−1·min−1) and (c) lactate clearance (%). Data are presented as a median (25th–75th percentile). *: Mann–Whitney significance between groups (alpha = 0.05).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Histology of proximal jejunum samples. (a) Methylene blue group, Chiu and Park score of 3, massive epithelial detachment along the sides of the villi, some denuded tips; (b) standard care group, Chiu and Park score of 4, denuded villi, dilated capillaries (HES, 100×).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Drennan I.R., Lin S., Sidalak D.E., Morrison L.J. Survival rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients transported without prehospital return of spontaneous circulation: An observational cohort study. Resuscitation. 2014;85:1488–1493. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.07.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chouihed T., Kimmoun A., Lauvray A., Laithier F.-X., Jaeger D., Lemoine S., Maureira J.P., Nace L., Duarte K., Albizzati S., et al. Improving Patient Selection for Refractory Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest Treated with Extracorporeal Life Support. Shock. 2018;49:24–28. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000941. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haas N.L., Coute R.A., Hsu C., Cranford J., Neumar R.W. Descriptive analysis of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest—An ELSO registry study. Resuscitation. 2017;119:56–62. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.08.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lott C., Truhlář A., Alfonzo A., Barelli A., González-Salvado V., Hinkelbein J., Nolan J.P., Paal P., Perkins G.D., Thies K.-C., et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation. 2021;161:152–219. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jozwiak M., Bougouin W., Geri G., Grimaldi D., Cariou A. Post-resuscitation shock: Recent advances in pathophysiology and treatment. Ann. Intensiv. Care. 2020;10:170. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00788-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources