A 10-Year Follow-Up of Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries: Prospective Comparison of Knotless Suture-Button Fixation and Syndesmotic Screw Fixation
- PMID: 35566650
- PMCID: PMC9105986
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092524
A 10-Year Follow-Up of Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries: Prospective Comparison of Knotless Suture-Button Fixation and Syndesmotic Screw Fixation
Abstract
Background: Acute syndesmosis injury (ASI) is an indication for surgical stabilization if instability is confirmed. In recent years, fixation using the knotless suture-button (SB) device has become increasingly established as an alternative to set screw fixation (SF). This study directly compared the clinical long-term results after prospective randomized inclusion. Materials and Methods: Between 2011 and 2012, 62 patients with ASI were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, and monocentric study. Forty-one patients were available for a 10-year follow-up ((31 males and 10 females), including 21 treated with SB (mean age 44.4 years), and 20 with SF (mean age 47.2 years)). In addition to comparing the demographic data and syndesmosis injury etiology, follow-up assessed the Olerud−Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and FADI-Score (Foot and Ankle Disability Index Score) with subscales for activities of daily living (ADL) and sports activity. Results: The mean OMAS was 95.98 points (SB: 98.81, SF: 93.00), the mean FADI ADL was 97.58 points (SB: 99.22, SF: 95.86), and the mean FADI Sport was 94.14 points (SB: 97.03, SF: 91.10). None of the measurements differed significantly between the groups (p > 0.05). No clinical suspicion of chronic instability remained in any of the patients, regardless of treatment. Conclusions: The short-term results showed that athletes in particular benefit from SB fixation due to their significantly faster return to sports activities. However, the available long-term results confirm a very good outcome in the clinical scores for both approaches. Chronic syndesmotic insufficiency was not suspected in any of the patients. Level of evidence: I, randomized controlled trial.
Keywords: suture-button device; syndesmotic injury; syndesmotic reduction; syndesmotic screw fixation.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. All authors agree to the publication of the data.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Lower complication rate and faster return to sports in patients with acute syndesmotic rupture treated with a new knotless suture button device.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Oct;26(10):3156-3164. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4820-3. Epub 2017 Dec 9. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018. PMID: 29224059 Clinical Trial.
-
The Clinical Efficacy of Suture-Button Fixation and Trans-Syndesmotic Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Ankle Fracture Combined With Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury: A Retrospective Study.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Jan-Feb;61(1):143-148. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.07.009. Epub 2021 Jul 20. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022. PMID: 34404589
-
Randomized trial comparing suture button with single 3.5 mm syndesmotic screw for ankle syndesmosis injury: similar results at 2 years.Acta Orthop. 2020 Dec;91(6):770-775. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1818175. Epub 2020 Sep 10. Acta Orthop. 2020. PMID: 32907456 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Syndesmotic Screw Fixation Versus Suture Button Versus Tibiotalocalcaneal Nail Treatment in Syndesmotic Ankle Fractures: A Meta-Analysis.Foot Ankle Spec. 2025 Feb 28:19386400251318965. doi: 10.1177/19386400251318965. Online ahead of print. Foot Ankle Spec. 2025. PMID: 40018814 Review.
-
Comparison of Suture Button and Syndesmotic Screw for Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Jan 5;11(1):23259671221127665. doi: 10.1177/23259671221127665. eCollection 2023 Jan. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 36636033 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of the outcomes of syndesmotic ankle fractures treated with dynamic fixation versus static fixation versus fibular nail: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Ann Jt. 2024 Sep 6;9:36. doi: 10.21037/aoj-24-14. eCollection 2024. Ann Jt. 2024. PMID: 39540066 Free PMC article.
-
Perspectives on Ligament Augmentation Techniques Among AOFAS Members: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025 Jul 23;10(3):24730114251346795. doi: 10.1177/24730114251346795. eCollection 2025 Jul. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40718079 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical Outcomes of Syndesmotic Fixation of Ankle Fractures Using Syndesmotic Screws Versus Suture Button Devices.Cureus. 2024 Jul 21;16(7):e65051. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65051. eCollection 2024 Jul. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39165436 Free PMC article.
-
Transosseous Fixation of the Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis: Comparison of Interosseous Suture and Endobutton Across Age Groups.Cureus. 2023 Jun 13;15(6):e40355. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40355. eCollection 2023 Jun. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37456394 Free PMC article.
-
Disclosed Industry Funding Does Not Increase Positive Outcomes in Studies on Suture Button Fixation for Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review.Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025 Jun 19;10(2):24730114251341305. doi: 10.1177/24730114251341305. eCollection 2025 Apr. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40547898 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lubberts B., D’Hooghe P., Bengtsson H., DiGiovanni C.W., Calder J., Ekstrand J. Epidemiology and return to play following isolated syndesmotic injuries of the ankle: A prospective cohort study of 3677 male professional footballers in the UEFA Elite Club Injury Study. Br. J. Sports Med. 2019;53:959–964. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097710. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources