Intravenous versus Epidural Routes of Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Abdominal Surgery: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 35566705
- PMCID: PMC9104513
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092579
Intravenous versus Epidural Routes of Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Abdominal Surgery: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Objective: To compare the intravenous and epidural routes of patient-controlled anesthesia in abdominal surgery.
Methods: We searched for randomized clinical trials that compared the intravenous and epidural modes of patient-controlled anesthesia in intra-abdominal surgery in adults. Data analysis was performed in RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was measured using I2 statistic. Risk of bias was assessed using the Jadad/Oxford quality scoring system.
Results: Seven studies reporting 529 patients were included into the meta-analysis. For pain at rest, the mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI) was -0.00 [-0.79, 0.78], p-value 0.99, while for pain on coughing, it was 0.43 [-0.02, 0.88], p-value 0.06, indicating that patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) was superior. For the sedation score, the mean difference with 95% CI was 0.26 [-0.37, 0.89], p-value 0.42, slightly favoring PCEA. For the length of hospital stay, the mean difference with 95% CI was 1.13 [0.29, 1.98], p-value 0.009, favoring PCEA. For postoperative complications, the risk ratio with 95% CI was 0.8 [0.62, 1.03], p-value 0.08, slightly favoring patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIVA). A significant effect was observed for hypotension, favoring PCIVA.
Conclusions: Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia compared with patient-controlled epidural analgesia was associated with fewer episodes of hypotension. PCEA, on other hand, was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay. Pain control and other side effects did not differ significantly. Only three studies out of seven had an acceptable methodological quality. Thus, these conclusions should be taken with caution.
Keywords: abdominal surgery; epidural analgesia; intravenous analgesia; pain control; patient-controlled analgesia; postoperative pain.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia/analgesia on the stress response, pain relief, hospital stay, and treatment costs of patients with esophageal carcinoma undergoing thoracic surgery: A single-center, randomized controlled trial.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(7):e14362. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014362. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 30762735 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Influence of patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain control and recovery after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective randomized trial.Gastric Cancer. 2013 Apr;16(2):193-200. doi: 10.1007/s10120-012-0168-z. Epub 2012 Jul 18. Gastric Cancer. 2013. PMID: 22806415 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of intravenous or epidural patient-controlled analgesia in the elderly after major abdominal surgery.Anesthesiology. 2000 Feb;92(2):433-41. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200002000-00025. Anesthesiology. 2000. PMID: 10691230 Clinical Trial.
-
Paravertebral anaesthesia with or without sedation versus general anaesthesia for women undergoing breast cancer surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 25;2(2):CD012968. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012968.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33629404 Free PMC article.
-
Epidural vs. transversus abdominis plane block for abdominal surgery - a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.Anaesthesia. 2021 Jan;76(1):101-117. doi: 10.1111/anae.15068. Epub 2020 May 8. Anaesthesia. 2021. PMID: 32385856
Cited by
-
A Retrospective Comparison of Three Patient-Controlled Analgesic Strategies: Intravenous Opioid Analgesia Plus Abdominal Wall Nerve Blocks versus Epidural Analgesia versus Intravenous Opioid Analgesia Alone in Open Liver Surgery.Biomedicines. 2022 Sep 27;10(10):2411. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10102411. Biomedicines. 2022. PMID: 36289673 Free PMC article.
-
Is OPRM1 genotype a valuable predictor of VAS in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer with fentanyl?BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 May 22;23(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02120-1. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023. PMID: 37217861 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Pain-Related Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 11;14(6):1879. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061879. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40142687 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development of a nomogram for the early prediction of PACU VAS in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer with fentanyl.Heliyon. 2023 Jul 22;9(8):e18560. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18560. eCollection 2023 Aug. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 37554790 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical