Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 5;11(9):2593.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11092593.

Use of CPAP Failure Score to Predict the Risk of Helmet-CPAP Support Failure in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Study

Affiliations

Use of CPAP Failure Score to Predict the Risk of Helmet-CPAP Support Failure in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Study

Francesco Alessandri et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

(1) Background: the aim of this study was to create a score to predict the incidence of CPAP failure in COVID-19 patients early. (2) Methods: in this retrospective observational study, we included all consecutive adult patients admitted between February and April 2021. The main outcome was the failure of CPAP support (intubation or death). (3) Results: two-hundred and sixty-three COVID-19 patients were managed with CPAP. The population was divided in short-CPAP (CPAP days ≤ 10; 72.6%) and long-CPAP (>10; 27.4%) groups. After balancing the entire population using a stabilized IPTW method, we applied a multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify the risk factors for CPAP failure. We used the identified covariates to create a mathematical model, the CPAP Failure Score (CPAP-FS). The multivariable logistic regression analysis identified four variables: SpO2 (OR = 0.86; p-value = 0.001), P/F ratio (OR = 0.99; p-value = 0.008), the Call Score (OR = 1.44; p-value = 0.02), and a pre-existing chronic lung disease (OR = 3.08; p-value = 0.057). The beta-coefficients obtained were used to develop the CPAP-FS, whose diagnostic ability outperformed other relevant COVID-19-related parameters (AUC = 0.87; p-value < 0.0001). We validated the CPAP-FS using a 10-fold internal cross-validation method which confirmed the observed results (AUCs 0.76−0.80; p-values < 0.0001). (4) Conclusions: the CPAP-FS can early identify COVID-19 patients who are at risk of CPAP failure.

Keywords: continuous positive airway pressure; non-invasive ventilation; respiratory failure; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Different CPAP failure rates in the different sub-classes of CPAP Failure Score.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of CPAP failures in the different sub-classes of CPAP Failure Score. (A) First quartile; (B) second quartile; (C) third quartile; (D) fourth quartile. Green = failure; blue = no failure.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wu Z., McGoogan J.M. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: Summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020;323:1239–1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gattinoni L., Chiumello D., Caironi P., Busana M., Romitti F., Brazzi L., Camporota L. COVID-19 pneumonia: Different respiratory treatments for different phenotypes? Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:1099–1102. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06033-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Camporota L., Chiumello D., Busana M., Romitti F., Gattinoni L. From phenotypes to black holes… and back. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:1498–1499. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06124-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marini J.J., Gattinoni L. Management of COVID-19 Respiratory Distress. JAMA. 2020;323:2329–2330. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6825. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Papoutsi E., Giannakoulis V.G., Xourgia E., Routsi C., Kotanidou A., Siempos I.I. Effect of timing of intubation on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized cohort studies. Crit. Care. 2021;25:121. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03540-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources