Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 May 6;11(9):2606.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11092606.

Endometrial Cancer Patient-Derived Xenograft Models: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Endometrial Cancer Patient-Derived Xenograft Models: A Systematic Review

Tomohito Tanaka et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background: Because patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models resemble the original tumors, they can be used as platforms to find target agents for precision medicine and to study characteristics of tumor biology such as clonal evolution and microenvironment interactions. The aim of this review was to identify articles on endometrial cancer PDXs (EC-PDXs) and verify the methodology and outcomes.

Methods: We used PubMed to research and identify articles on EC-PDX. The data were analyzed descriptively.

Results: Post literature review, eight studies were selected for the systematic review. Eighty-five EC-PDXs were established from 173 patients with EC, with a total success rate of 49.1%. A 1-10 mm3 fragment was usually implanted. Fresh-fragment implantation had higher success rates than using overnight-stored or frozen fragments. Primary tumors were successfully established with subcutaneous implantation, but metastasis rarely occurred; orthotopic implantation via minced tumor cell injection was better for metastatic models. The success rate did not correspond to immunodeficiency grades, and PDXs using nude mice reduced costs. The tumor growth period ranged from 2 weeks to 13 months. Similar characteristics were observed between primary tumors and PDXs, including pathological findings, gene mutations, and gene expression.

Conclusion: EC-PDXs are promising tools for translational research because they closely resemble the features of tumors in patients and retain molecular and histological features of the disease.

Keywords: PDX; endometrial cancer; patient-derived xenograft.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic for the use of patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. PDX models can be created by grafting the tissue obtained by surgery or biopsy into immunodeficient mice. Patient-derived cells (PDCs) are also created from tumors. All materials and information from cancer patients and PDX models are stored in biobanks and data banks. The materials include all samples obtained from patients or PDX models, such as blood, urine, discharge, and tumors. The information also includes clinicopathological, genomic analysis, and drug sensitivity data. These materials and information in biobanks and databanks are intended for use in precision medicine and the development of anticancer agents; this platform allows many researchers to share all types of information and conduct experiments with PDXs that reflect the characteristics of the primary tumor.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart showing the results of the search process.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Quality assessment of the studies included in this systematic review. Green circles indicate studies that reported the evaluated item (low risk of bias); red circles indicate studies that did not report the evaluated item (high risk of bias); and yellow circles indicate studies that did not define or only partially reported the evaluated item [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tanaka T., Ueda S., Miyamoto S., Terada S., Konishi H., Kogata Y., Fujiwara S., Tanaka Y., Taniguchi K., Komura K., et al. Oncologic outcomes for patients with endometrial cancer who received minimally invasive surgery: A retrospective observational study. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020;25:1985–1994. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01744-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tanaka T., Yamashita S., Kuroboshi H., Kamibayashi J., Sugiura A., Yoriki K., Mori T., Tanaka K., Nagashima A., Maeda M., et al. Oncologic outcomes in elderly patients who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: A multi-institutional survey in Kinki District, Japan. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s10147-022-02152-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilding J.L., Bodmer W.F. Cancer cell lines for drug discovery and development. Cancer Res. 2014;74:2377–2384. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2971. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu C., Qin T., Huang Y., Li Y., Chen G., Sun C. Drug screening model meets cancer organoid technology. Transl. Oncol. 2020;13:100840. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100840. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harrison R.K. Phase II and phase III failures: 2013-2015. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2016;15:817–818. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.184. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources