Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 29;14(9):1832.
doi: 10.3390/polym14091832.

Biogenic Synthesis and Characterization of Chitosan-CuO Nanocomposite and Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity against Gram-Positive and -Negative Bacteria

Affiliations

Biogenic Synthesis and Characterization of Chitosan-CuO Nanocomposite and Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity against Gram-Positive and -Negative Bacteria

Peace Saviour Umoren et al. Polymers (Basel). .

Abstract

Chitosan-copper oxide (CHT-CuO) nanocomposite was synthesized using olive leaf extract (OLE) as reducing agent and CuSO4⋅5H2O as precursor. CHT-CuO nanocomposite was prepared using an in situ method in which OLE was added to a solution of chitosan and CuSO4⋅5H2O mixture in the ratio of 1:5 (v/v) and heated at a temperature of 90 °C. The obtained CHT-CuO nanocomposite was characterized using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometry, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDAX), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM). TEM results indicated that CHT-CuO nanocomposite are spherical in shape with size ranging from 3.5 to 6.0 nm. Antibacterial activity of the synthesized nanocomposites was evaluated against Gram-positive (Bacillus cereus, Staphyloccous haemolytica and Micrococcus Luteus) and Gram-negative (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas citronellolis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, kliebisella sp., Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Ralstonia pickettii) species by cup platting or disc diffusion method. Overall, against all tested bacterial strains, the diameters of the inhibition zone of the three nanocomposites fell between 6 and 24 mm, and the order of the antimicrobial activity was as follows: CuO-1.0 > CuO-0.5 > CuO-2.0. The reference antibiotic amoxicillin and ciprofloxacin showed greater activity based on the diameter of zones of inhibition (between 15−32 mm) except for S. heamolytica and P. citronellolis bacteria strains. The nanocomposites MIC/MBC were between 0.1 and 0.01% against all tested bacteria, except S. heamolityca (>0.1%). Based on MIC/MBC values, CuO-0.5 and CuO-1.0 were more active than CuO-2.0, in line with the observations from the disc diffusion experiment. The findings indicate that these nanocomposites are efficacious against bacteria; however, Gram-positive bacteria were less susceptible. The synthesized CHT-CuO nanocomposite shows promising antimicrobial activities and could be utilized as an antibacterial agent in packaging and medical applications.

Keywords: antibacterial activity; chitosan; copper oxide; nanocomposite; olive leaf extract.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of biogenic in situ preparation of CH−CuO nanocomposite.
Figure 2
Figure 2
UV-vis spectra of OLE and CHT−CuO nanocomposite.
Figure 3
Figure 3
FTIR spectra of OLE, chitosan, and CHT− CuO nanocomposite.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Zeta potential plot for CHT− CuO nanocomposite at different pH values.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a) XRD pattern and (b) XRD peak plots for CHT−CuO nanocomposites.
Figure 6
Figure 6
FE-SEM image of CHT−CuO nanocomposite.
Figure 7
Figure 7
(a) EDS spectrum and (b) elemental mapping of CHT−CuO nanocomposite.
Figure 8
Figure 8
(a,b) TEM micrographs of CHT-CuO nanocomposite at different magnifications and (c) SAED pattern.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Zones of inhibition showing antibacterial activity of the chitosan-CuO nanocomposite in comparison with antibiotics (ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin) against (A) Gram-positive and (B) Gram-negative bacteria.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Liu Y., Jiang Y., Zhu J., Huang J., Zhang H. Inhibition of bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation of sulfonated chitosan against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019;206:12–419. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.071. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bassetti M., Vena A., Croxatto A., Righi E., Guery B. How to manage Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Drugs Context. 2018;27:212527. doi: 10.7573/dic.212527. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hiramatsu K. Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A new model of antibiotic resistance. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2001;1:147–155. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(01)00091-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Das B., Moumita S., Ghosh S., Khan M.I., Indira D., Jayabalan R., Tripathy S.K., Mishra A., Balasubramanian P. Biosynthesis of magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoflakes by using leaf extract of Bauhinia purpurea and evaluation of its antibacterial property against Staphylococcus aureus. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2018;91:436–444. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.05.059. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Azam A., Ahmed A.S., Oves M., Khan M.S., Memic A. Size-dependent antimicrobial properties of CuO nanoparticles against Gram-positive and -negative bacterial strains. Int. J. Nanomed. 2021;7:3527–3535. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S29020. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources