Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 24;11(9):1153.
doi: 10.3390/plants11091153.

An Overview of Soil and Soilless Cultivation Techniques-Chances, Challenges and the Neglected Question of Sustainability

Affiliations
Review

An Overview of Soil and Soilless Cultivation Techniques-Chances, Challenges and the Neglected Question of Sustainability

Andre Fussy et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

Resources such as fertile soil and clean water are already limited in many parts of the world. Additionally, the conventional use of arable land is becoming increasingly difficult, which is further exacerbated by climate change. Soilless cultivation systems do not only offer the opportunity to save water and cultivate without soil but also the chance to open up urban areas such as residential rooftops for food production in close proximity to consumers. In this review, applications of soilless farming systems are identified and compared to conventional agriculture. Furthermore, aspects of economic viability, sustainability and current developments are investigated. An insight into the most important soilless farming systems-hydroponics, aquaponics and vertical farming-is provided. The systems are then differentiated from each other and, as far as possible, evaluated in terms of their environmental impact and compared with conventional cultivation methods. Comparing published data analyzing the yield of hydroponic cultivation systems in comparison to soil-based cultivation methods enables a basic overview of the profitability of both methods and, thus, lays the foundation for future research and practical applications. The most important inert substrates for hydroponic applications are presented, and their degree of sustainability is compared in order to emphasize environmental impacts and affect substrate selections of future projects. Based on an assessment of the most important soilless cultivation systems, the challenges and developments of current techniques are highlighted and discussed.

Keywords: aquaponics; hydroponics; nutrients; sustainability; vertical farming.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wackernagel M., Cranston G., Morales J.C., Galli A. Ecological Footprint Accounts. In: Atkinson G., Dietz S., Neumayer E., editors. Handbook of Sustainable Development. Edward Elgar; Cheltenham, England: 2014.
    1. Lin D., Galli A., Borucke M., Lazarus E., Grunewald N. Tracking Supply and Demand of Biocapacity through Ecological Footprint Accounting. In: Dewulf J., de Meester S., Alvarenga R.A.F., editors. Sustainability Assessment of Renewables-Based Products. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; Chichester, UK: 2015. pp. 179–200.
    1. Lin D., Hanscom L., Murthy A., Galli A., Evans M., Neill E., Mancini M.S., Martindill J., Medouar F.-Z., Huang S., et al. Ecological Footprint Accounting for Countries: Updates and Results of the National Footprint Accounts, 2012–2018. Resources. 2018;7:58. doi: 10.3390/resources7030058. - DOI
    1. Wackernagel M., Galli A., Hanscom L., Lin D., Mailhes L. Ecological Footprint accounting: Criticisms and applications. In: Bell S., Morse S., editors. Routledge Handbook of Sustainability Indicators. Routledge; London, UK: 2018. pp. 521–539.
    1. Wackernagel M., Galli A., Hanscom L., Lin D., Mailhes L. Ecological Footprint accounting. In: Bell S., Morse S., editors. Principles Routledge Handbook of Sustainability Indicators. Routledge; London, UK: 2018. pp. 244–264.

LinkOut - more resources