Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;82(3):280-288.
doi: 10.1111/jphd.12526. Epub 2022 May 14.

Cost-effectiveness of probiotics and fluoride varnish in caries prevention in preschool children

Gonzalo A Rodriguez  1 , Rodrigo A Cabello  1 , Catalina P Borroni  2 , Raul A Palacio  2
Affiliations

Cost-effectiveness of probiotics and fluoride varnish in caries prevention in preschool children

Gonzalo A Rodriguez et al. J Public Health Dent. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of two preventive interventions aimed at increasing the proportion of caries-free preschool children of low socioeconomic status using a decision analytic model.

Methods: Two scenarios were tested, one with a school milk program (SMP) and one without (non-SMP). Fluoride varnish (FV) and a probiotic (PB) were compared to a do-nothing alternative among children in public nurseries/schools over a 4-year period. FV was applied biannually and a PB (Lactobacillus rhamnosus) added to milk powder prepared daily. A Markov decision tree model was utilized. Several sources of data were used to populate the model. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed, and a public provider perspective was used.

Results: In the SMP scenario, PB was more effective and less costly than FV and, compared with do-nothing, increased the proportion of caries-free children by 14.5%, with a cost of USD 12.5 per child (June 2018). PB presented an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) or cost per extra caries-free child of USD 86.2. In the non-SMP scenario, both interventions were cost-effective. FV (compared with do-nothing) increased the percentage of caries-free children by 8.3% with an ICER of USD 338.3 and PB (compared with FV) increased the effect by 6.2% with an ICER of USD 1400.2.

Conclusions: The findings showed that PB was most effective and less costly than FV in the SMP scenario only. This type of analysis and its results provide essential information for decision-makers to improve the oral health of preschool children.

Keywords: cost-effectiveness analysis; decision analytic model; dental caries; fluoride varnish; health economics; preschoolers; probiotics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Phantumvanit P, Makino Y, Ogawa H, Rugg-Gunn A, Moynihan P, Petersen PE, et al. WHO global consultation on public health intervention against early childhood caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2018;46:280-7.
    1. Peres MA, Macpherson LMD, Weyant RJ, Daly B, Venturelli R, Mathur MR, et al. Oral diseases: a global public health challenge. Lancet. 2019;394:249-60.
    1. Fontana M, Eckert GJ, Keels MA, Jackson R, Katz B, Levy BT, et al. Fluoride use in health care settings: association with children's caries risk. Adv Dent Res. 2018;29:24-34.
    1. Macpherson LM, Ball GE, Brewster L, Duane B, Hodges CL, Wright W, et al. Childsmile: the national child oral health improvement programme in Scotland. Part 1: establishment and development. Br Dent J. 2010;209:79-83.
    1. MINSAL. Orientaciones técnico-administrativas para la ejecución del programa Sembrando Sonrisas. Chile: Ministry of Health; 2018.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources