Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug:164:e420-e426.
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.120. Epub 2022 May 11.

Self-Shielding Gyroscopic Radiosurgery-A First Clinical Experience, Case Series, and Dosimetric Comparison

Affiliations

Self-Shielding Gyroscopic Radiosurgery-A First Clinical Experience, Case Series, and Dosimetric Comparison

Alexander Muacevic et al. World Neurosurg. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Self-shielding gyroscopic radiosurgery (GRS) represents a technical innovation in the field of stereotactic radiosurgery. GRS does not require a radiation vault and is optimized for radiosurgical treatments. Reports on its usage are limited. We describe the first clinical experience of GRS at our institution to assess the application of GRS in the treatment of cranial tumors. Moreover, we perform a dosimetric comparison to robotic radiosurgery (RRS) with vestibular schwannoma (VS) GRS patients.

Methods: Patients who were treated with GRS between July and November 2021 were included. Patient, tumor, and dosimetric characteristics were retrospectively summarized and analyzed.

Results: Forty-one patients with 48 intracranial tumors were included. Tumor entities mostly comprised VS, brain metastases, and meningiomas. The median prescription dose and isodose line were 13.5 Gy and 50.0% for benign neoplasia versus 20 Gy and 60.0% for malignant tumors, respectively. The mean planning target volume was 1.5 cubic centimeters. All patients received a single-fraction treatment without encountering any technical setup difficulties. Treatment plan comparisons with RRS revealed comparable plan characteristics, dose gradients, and organs at risk doses. Significant differences were detected concerning the new conformity index and number of monitor units per treatment (both P < 0.01).

Conclusions: This case series provides more evidence on the usage of self-shielding GRS in the management of cranial tumors. Dosimetric comparisons for VS cases revealed mostly equivalent dosimetric characteristics to RRS. Further clinical and physical analyses for GRS are underway.

Keywords: Case series; CyberKnife; Dosimetry; Gyroscopic radiosurgery; Stereotactic radiosurgery; Treatment planning; ZAP-X.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources