Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Jul;129(1):114-126.
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.021. Epub 2022 May 12.

Delivery of drinking, eating and mobilising (DrEaMing) and its association with length of hospital stay after major noncardiac surgery: observational cohort study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Delivery of drinking, eating and mobilising (DrEaMing) and its association with length of hospital stay after major noncardiac surgery: observational cohort study

Charles M Oliver et al. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Enhanced recovery pathways are associated with improved postoperative outcomes. However, as enhanced recovery pathways have become more complex and varied, compliance has reduced. The 'DrEaMing' bundle re-prioritises early postoperative delivery of drinking, eating, and mobilising. We investigated relationships between DrEaMing compliance, postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS), and complications in a prospective multicentre major surgical cohort.

Methods: We interrogated the UK Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme dataset. Analyses were conducted in four stages. In an exploratory cohort, we identified independent predictors of DrEaMing. We quantified the association between delivery of DrEaMing (and its component variables) and prolonged LOS in a homogenous colorectal subgroup and assessed generalisability in multispecialty patients. Finally, LOS and complications were compared across hospitals, stratified by DrEaMing compliance.

Results: The exploratory cohort comprised 22 218 records, the colorectal subgroup 7230, and the multispecialty subgroup 5713. DrEaMing compliance was 59% (13 112 patients), 60% (4341 patients), and 60% (3421), respectively, but varied substantially between hospitals. Delivery of DrEaMing predicted reduced odds of prolonged LOS in colorectal (odds ratio 0.51 [0.43-0.59], P<0.001) and multispecialty cohorts (odds ratio 0.47 [0.41-0.53], P<0.001). At the hospital level, complications were not the primary determinant of LOS after colorectal surgery, but consistent delivery of DrEaMing was associated with significantly shorter LOS.

Conclusions: Delivery of bundled and unbundled DrEaMing was associated with substantial reductions in postoperative LOS, independent of the effects of confounder variables. Consistency of process delivery, and not complications, predicted shorter hospital-level length of stay. DrEaMing may be adopted by perioperative health systems as a quality metric to support improved patient outcomes and reduced hospital length of stay.

Keywords: enhanced recovery; patient-centred outcomes; perioperative; quality improvement; quality metric; shared decision-making; surgical outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interest All authors declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Quintile analysis, in which hospitals were stratified on the distribution of the proportion of patients DrEaMing (drinking, eating, and mobilising) per hospital (q20: 33%, q40: 45%, q60: 67%, q80: 81%). (a) Incidence of major postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥Grade II), range 21–24% at Q5 and Q3 hospitals, respectively (P=0.21). (b) Postoperative median length of stay, 7 (5–9) days at Q1 hospitals and 5 (4–8) days at Q5 hospitals (P<0.001, Kruskall–Wallis).

Comment in

References

    1. Wilmore D.W., Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ. 2001;322:473–476. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levy N., Mills P., Mythen M. Is the pursuit of DREAMing (drinking, eating and mobilising) the ultimate goal of anaesthesia? Anaesthesia. 2016;71:1008–1012. - PubMed
    1. Lee L., Mata J., Ghitulescu G.A., et al. Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery versus conventional perioperative management for colorectal surgery. Ann Surg. 2015;262:1026–1033. - PubMed
    1. Lee L., Li C., Landry T., et al. A systematic review of economic evaluations of enhanced recovery pathways for colorectal surgery. Ann Surg. 2014;259:670–676. - PubMed
    1. Simpson J.C., Moonesinghe S.R., Grocott M.P.W., et al. Enhanced recovery from surgery in the UK: an audit of the enhanced recovery partnership programme 2009–2012. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115:560–568. - PubMed

Publication types