Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 14;12(1):7991.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12050-6.

Poor hygiene of housing conditions influences energy metabolism in a muscle type-dependent manner in growing pigs differing in feed efficiency

Affiliations

Poor hygiene of housing conditions influences energy metabolism in a muscle type-dependent manner in growing pigs differing in feed efficiency

Annie Vincent et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The ability of pigs to cope with inflammatory challenges may by modified by selection for residual feed intake (RFI), a measure of feed efficiency. In the current study, we evaluated skeletal muscle metabolic responses to degraded hygiene conditions in pigs divergently selected for RFI. At 82 d of age, low RFI and high RFI pigs were housed in either poor or good hygiene conditions. After a 6-week challenge, the poor hygiene conditions induced a decrease in growth performance (P < 0.001) and in plasma IGF-I concentrations (P < 0.003) in both lines. In the slow-twitch oxidative semispinalis muscle, poor hygiene conditions induced a shift towards a more oxidative metabolism and an activation of the AMPK pathway in pigs of both RFI lines. In the fast-twitch glycolytic longississimus muscle, poor hygiene conditions were associated to a less glycolytic metabolism in the HRFI line only. Poor hygiene conditions also increased the protein level of lipidation of microtubule-associated protein 1 light-chain 3β (LC3-II) in both RFI lines, suggesting an activation of the autophagy pathway. Altogether, the data revealed muscle-type specific metabolic adaptations to poor hygiene conditions, which may be related to different strategies to fuel the activated immune system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect of poor versus good hygiene condition (Hyg) on growth performance and plasma IGF-I concentration of pigs divergently selected for low or high residual feed intake (LRFI and HRFI lines). (A) Average daily feed intake (ADFI), (B) Average daily gain (ADG), (C) Gain to feed ratio (G:F), and (D) Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF1). Means ± standard error of the mean are reported on figures (n = 6 to 10/experimental group).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Le Floc'h N, et al. Impact of feed restriction on health, digestion and faecal microbiota of growing pigs housed in good or poor hygiene conditions. Animal. 2014;8:1632–1642. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114001608. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van der Meer Y, et al. Performance of pigs kept under different sanitary conditions affected by protein intake and amino acid supplementation. J. Anim. Sci. 2016;94:4704–4719. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016-0787. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Te Paas MF, et al. Sanitary conditions affect the colonic microbiome and the colonic and systemin metabolome of female pigs. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020;7:585730. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.585730. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Merlot E, Gilbert H, Le Floc'h N. Metabolic response to an inflammatory challenge in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake. J. Anim. Sci. 2016;94:563–573. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9445. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sun H, et al. Lipopolysaccharide markedly changes glucose metabolism and mitochondrial function in the longissimus muscle of pigs. Animal. 2016;10:1204–1212. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116000100. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types