Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug:126:116-122.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.05.003. Epub 2022 May 13.

Environmental SARS-CoV-2 contamination in hospital rooms of patients with acute COVID-19

Affiliations

Environmental SARS-CoV-2 contamination in hospital rooms of patients with acute COVID-19

S Nagle et al. J Hosp Infect. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Data on the transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) remain conflicting. Airborne transmission is still debated. However, hospital risk control requires better understanding of the different modes of transmission. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of, and factors associated with, environmental air and surface contamination in the rooms of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in the acute phase of the disease.

Methods: Sixty-five consecutive patients were included in this study. For each patient, seven room surfaces, air 1 m and 3 m from the patient's head, the inner surface of the patient's mask, and the outer surface of healthcare workers' (HCW) masks were sampled. Environmental contamination was assessed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) for SARS-CoV-2 RNA on surfaces, air and masks. A viral isolation test was performed on Vero cells for samples with an RT-qPCR cycle threshold (Ct) ≤37.

Results: SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected by RT-qPCR in 34%, 12%, 50% and 10% of surface, air, patient mask and HCW mask samples, respectively. Infectious virus was isolated in culture from two samples among the 85 positive samples with Ct ≤37. On multi-variate analysis, only a positive result for SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR for patients' face masks was found to be significantly associated with surface contamination (odds ratio 5.79, 95% confidence interval 1.31-25.67; P=0.025).

Conclusion: This study found that surface contamination by SARS-CoV-2 was more common than air and mask contamination. However, viable virus was rare. The inner surface of a patient's mask could be used as a marker to identify those at higher risk of contamination.

Keywords: Airborne contamination; COVID-19; Environmental contamination; Infection control; Viral isolation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency of positive surfaces by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). formula image, each surface sampled for the study; %, percentage of samples contaminated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA on each surface; Ct, median cycle threshold of positive SARS-CoV-2 quantitative RT-PCR on each surface. Blue surfaces represent the surfaces most frequently contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 RNA. This image was designed using the resources of Flaticon.com.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow chart for viral isolation tests. RT-qPCR, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; Ct, cycle threshold; CPE, cytopathic effect.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Correlation between cycle threshold (Ct) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) on nasopharyngeal swab (test collected closest to sampling day) and the percentage of RT-qPCR-positive surfaces. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient of -0.48 (P<0.001).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kutter J.S., Spronken M.I., Fraaij P.L., Fouchier R.A., Herfst S. Transmission routes of respiratory viruses among humans. Curr Opin Virol. 2018;28:142–151. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patel K.P., Vunnam S.R., Patel P.A., Krill K.L., Korbitz P.M., Gallagher J.P., et al. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: an update of current literature. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39:2005–2011. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heneghan C.J., Spencer E.A., Brassey J., Plüddemann A., Onakpoya I.J., Evans D.H., et al. SARS-CoV-2 and the role of airborne transmission: a systematic review. F1000Res. 2021;10:232. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenhalgh T., Jimenez J.L., Prather K.A., Tufekci Z., Fisman D., Schooley R. Ten scientific reasons in support of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Lancet. 2021;397:1603–1605. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nissen K., Krambrich J., Akaberi D., Hoffman T., Ling J., Å Lundkvist, et al. Long-distance airborne dispersal of SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 wards. Sci Rep. 2020;10 - PMC - PubMed