A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer 'Blood in Pee' campaign in England
- PMID: 35570375
- PMCID: PMC9539495
- DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13606
A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer 'Blood in Pee' campaign in England
Abstract
Objective: To assess the impact of the fourth Be Clear on Cancer (BCoC) 'Blood in Pee' (BiP) campaign (July to September 2018) on bladder and kidney cancer symptom awareness and outcomes in England.
Methods: In this uncontrolled before and after study, symptom awareness and reported barriers to GP attendance were assessed using panel and one-to-one interviews. The Health Improvement Network (THIN), National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS) and NHS Cancer Waiting Times (CWT) data were analysed to assess the impact on GP attendances, urgent cancer referrals, cancer diagnoses and 1-year survival. Analyses used Poisson, negative binomial and Cox regression.
Results: Symptom awareness and intention to consult a GP after one episode of haematuria increased following the campaign. GP attendance with haematuria (rate ratio (RR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-1.28) and urgent cancer referrals (RR 1.18 95% CI: 1.08-1.28) increased following the campaign. Early-stage diagnoses increased for bladder cancer (difference in percentage 2.8%, 95% CI: -0.2%-5.8%), but not for kidney cancer (difference -0.6%, 95% CI: -3.2%-2.1%).
Conclusions: The fourth BCoC BiP campaign appears to have been effective in increasing bladder cancer symptom awareness and GP attendances, although long-term impacts are unclear.
Keywords: awareness; early diagnosis; haematuria; kidney neoplasms; public health; urinary bladder neoplasms.
© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Cancer Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Cancer Research UK . (2020). Kidney cancer incidence statistics. Retrieved November 20, 2020, from https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/s...
-
- Forbes, L. J. L. , Simon, A. E. , Warburton, F. , Boniface, D. , Brain, K. E. , Dessaix, A. , Donnelly, C. , Haynes, K. , Hvidberg, L. , Lagerlund, M. , Lockwood, G. , Tishelman, C. , Vedsted, P. , Vigmostad, M. N. , Ramirez, A. J. , Wardle, J. , & The ICBP Working Group 2 . (2015). Differences in cancer awareness and beliefs between Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK (the international cancer benchmarking partnership): Do they contribute to differences in cancer survival? British Journal of Cancer, 108, 292–300. 10.1038/bjc.2012.542 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
