Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 27:9:842567.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.842567. eCollection 2022.

Historical Context of Cardiac Rehabilitation: Learning From the Past to Move to the Future

Affiliations
Review

Historical Context of Cardiac Rehabilitation: Learning From the Past to Move to the Future

Julie Redfern et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Contemporary myocardial infarction (MI) care and management has evolved dramatically since the 1950's; yet outpatient rehabilitation remains underutilized. Deepening our understanding of the origins and history of cardiac rehabilitation highlights a contemporary shift required for policy and practice related to secondary prevention of coronary disease in light of societal changes as well as medical, digital and surgical advancements. Contemporary "cardiac rehabilitation" began when bed rest and physical inactivity was recommended and commonplace for MI survivors. Today, most patients who survive an MI, undergo reperfusion therapy, a short inpatient stay and are discharged with minimal physical morbidity. Despite this, the majority of modern day programs continue to be structured in the same way they have been for the past 50 years and this model has become incongruent with the contemporary context, especially in the COVID-19 era. This review aims to describe the historical foundations of cardiac rehabilitation to inform solutions and meet the demands of contemporary MI management. Delivering health systems reform to address modernization is current healthcare challenge where a united and interdisciplinary effort is needed.

Keywords: cardiac rehabilitation; data; digital health; heart; secondary prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Timeline for cardiac rehabilitation in the context of acute care and transformation and societal change. PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft surgery; ICU, intensive care unit.

References

    1. World Health Organization [WHO]. Cardiovascular Diseases Factsheet. (2021). Available online at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/cardiovascular-diseases#tab=tab_1 (accessed November 18, 2021).
    1. Khan MA, Hashim MJ, Mustaf H, Baniyas MY, Al Suwaidi S, AlKatheeri R, et al. Global epidemiology of ischemic heart disease: results from the global burden of disease study. Cureus. (2020) 12:e9349. 10.7759/cureus.9349 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Redfern J, Hyun K, Brieger D, Chew D, French J, Astley C, et al. Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on 3 year outcomes amongst patients after acute coronary syndrome: (ACS) SNAPSHOT ACS follow-up study. Eur Heart J. (2020) 41:ehaa946.3108.
    1. Briffa TG, Hobbs MST, Tonkin A, Sanfilippo FM, Hickling S, Ridout SC, et al. Population trends of recurrent coronary heart disease event rates remain high. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcome. (2011) 4:107–13. 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.957944 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moodie AR. Australia: the healthiest country by 2020. Med J Aust. 2008. 189:588–90. 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb02189.x - DOI - PubMed