Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 10:9:23821205221096375.
doi: 10.1177/23821205221096375. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

Validation of the Romanian Communication Skills Ability Scale - CSAS-RO - A Tool for Medical Schools

Affiliations

Validation of the Romanian Communication Skills Ability Scale - CSAS-RO - A Tool for Medical Schools

Andreea Steriu et al. J Med Educ Curric Dev. .

Abstract

In medicine ability to communicate requires training and continuous development.

Aim: To validate the Communication Skills Ability Scale in Romanian. Study design: cross-sectional observational interrupted large case series. Sample and setting: all year 5 medical undergraduate students enrolled at UMF Carol Davila, Bucharest (UMFCD). A two field tests study: 1) 2nd semester of the 2017/2018 academic year (n = 361); 2) 2018/2019 academic year (n = 703).

Methodology: The Romanian translation of CSAS® was used.

Results: The CSAS-RO confirms the 2-Factor scale; internal consistency: Cronbach-α coefficient was 0.894 for the PAS (0.870 CSAS®) and 0.754 for the NAS (0.805 CSAS®) All item-total and item-rest correlations satisfied the criterion of more than 0.30, ranging from 0.32 to 0.71 with the exception of items 17 (field test 1) and item 11 (field test 2).

Conclusion: CSAS-RO is valid to use with medical students. The reuse of the scale with a longitudinal study design will allow to assess any new educational needs for communication ability in medical students plus add the remaining property to test (the test-retest reliability).

Keywords: MeSH terms: communication methods; education; medical; medicine; total; undergraduate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DECLARATION OF CONFLICTING INTERESTS: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Screeplots oblimin oblique for factor loadings. Field test 1 (a) Field test 2 (b).

References

    1. Stoicescu EG. 11. Principii etice ale comunicarii in cadrul organizatiilor din sistemul de sanatate. In “Ghid de comunicare si marketing social – Instrumente de promovare a comunicarii in sanatate” 117-139, Editura Universitara “Carol Davila”; 2003. ISBN 973-8047-97-8
    1. Shankar P, Dubey A, Balasubramanium R, Dwivedi N. Student attitude towards communication skills learning in a Caribbean medical school. Australas Med J. 2013;6(9):466-475. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stirrat GM, Johnston C, Gillon R, et al. Medical ethics and law for doctors of tomorrow: the 1998 consensus statement updated. J Med Ethics. 2010. Jan;36(1):55-60. - PubMed
    1. Rees C, Sheard C, Davies S. The development of a scale to measure medical students’ attitudes towards communication skills learning: the communication skills attitude scale (CSAS). Med Educ. 2002;36:141-147. Blackwell Science Ltd. - PubMed
    1. Von Fragstein M, Silverman J, Cushing A, et al. UK Consensus statement on the content of communication curricula in undergraduate medical education. Medical Educ ation 2008;42:1100-1107. DOI:10.1111/j1365-2923.2008.03137.x - DOI - PubMed