Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 29:9:884915.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.884915. eCollection 2022.

Lung Metastases: Current Surgical Indications and New Perspectives

Affiliations
Review

Lung Metastases: Current Surgical Indications and New Perspectives

Giuseppe Mangiameli et al. Front Surg. .

Abstract

Pulmonary metastasectomy is an established treatment that can provide improved long- term survival for patients with metastatic tumor(s) in the lung. In this mini-review, we discuss the state of the art of thoracic surgery in surgical management of lung metastases which actually occurs for a large part of surgical activity in thoracic surgery department. We describe the principles of surgical therapy that have been defined across the time, and that should remain the milestones of lung metastases treatment: a radical surgery and an adequate lymphadenectomy. We then focus on current surgical indications and report the oncological results according to the surgical approach (open vs. mini-invasive), the histological type and number of lung metastases, and in case of re-metastasectomy. Finally, we conclude with a brief overview about the future perspectives in thoracic surgery in treatment of lung metastases.

Keywords: indications; lung metastases; pulmonary metastasectomy; secondary lung cancer; thoracic surgery; wedge resections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer FP declared a shared affiliation with the author UC to the handling editor at the time of review.

References

    1. Pastorino U. Lung metastasectomy: why, when, how. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. (1997) 26:137–45. 10.1016/S1040-8428(97)00017-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pfannschmidt J, Egerer G, Bischof M, Thomas M, Dienemann H. Surgical intervention for pulmonary metastases. Dtsch Arztebl Int. (2012) 109:645–51. 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0645 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rusch VW. Pulmonary metastasectomy. current indications. Chest. (1995) 107 (Suppl. 6):322S−31S. 10.1378/chest.107.6_Supplement.322S - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pastorino U, Buyse M, Friedel G, Ginsberg RJ, Girard P, Goldstraw P et al. Long-term results of lung metastasectomy: prognostic analyses based on 5206 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (1997) 113:37–49. 10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70397-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Higashiyama M, Tokunaga T, Nakagiri T, Ishida D, Kuno H, Okami J. Pulmonary metastasectomy: outcomes and issues according to the type of surgical resection. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2015) 63:320–30. 10.1007/s11748-015-0544-9 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources