Crystallization of the critical power controversy: response to Black et al
- PMID: 35576082
- DOI: 10.1007/s00421-022-04968-6
Crystallization of the critical power controversy: response to Black et al
Comment on
-
A critique of "A critical review of critical power".Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022 Jul;122(7):1745-1746. doi: 10.1007/s00421-022-04959-7. Epub 2022 Apr 30. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022. PMID: 35488901 No abstract available.
References
-
- Dotan R (2012) Reverse lactate threshold: a novel, single-session approach to reliable high-resolution estimation of the anaerobic threshold. Int J Sports Physiol Perf 7:141–151. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.7.2.141 - DOI
-
- Dotan R (2022) A critical review of critical power. Eur J Appl Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-04922-6 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hill DW (1993) The critical power concept—a review. Sports Med 16(4):237–254 - DOI
-
- Jones AM, Burnley M, Black MI, Poole DC, Vanhatalo A (2019) The maximal metabolic steady state: redefining the ‘gold standard.’ Physiol Rep 7(10):e14098. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14098 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Moritani T, Nagata A, DeVries HA, Muro M (1981) Critical power as a measure of physical work capacity and anaerobic threshold. Ergonomics 24(5):339–350 - DOI