Association of an Obstetric Surgical Closing Protocol With Infection After Cesarean Delivery
- PMID: 35576333
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004729
Association of an Obstetric Surgical Closing Protocol With Infection After Cesarean Delivery
Abstract
Objective: To examine surgical site infection rates before and after the addition of a closing protocol to an existing surgical site infection risk-reduction bundle used during cesarean delivery.
Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study to review the association of a closing protocol with rates of surgical site infection after cesarean delivery. The closing protocol included fresh surgical instruments and physician and scrub nurse glove change before fascia closure. Surgical site infections were defined using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Eligible patients underwent cesarean delivery at our institution from July 1, 2013, through December 31, 2015 (n=1,708; preimplementation group), or from June 1, 2016, through April 30, 2018 (n=1,228; postimplementation group).
Results: The surgical site infection rate was 2.3% preimplementation and 2.7% postimplementation (difference 0.4%, 95% CI -1.6 to 0.7%]. The mean [SD] duration of the surgical procedure was longer postimplementation (59.6 [23.7] vs 55.6 [21.5] minutes; P<.001).
Conclusion: Addition of a closing tray and glove change to our existing surgical site infection risk-reduction bundle was not associated with a reduction in the frequency of postcesarean surgical site infection but was associated with longer operating times.
Copyright © 2022 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
Surgical Closing Protocol and Surgical Site Infection After Cesarean Delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 2022 May 1;139(5):745-747. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004775. Epub 2022 Apr 5. Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35576332 No abstract available.
References
-
- Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK. Births: final data for 2019. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2021;70:1–51.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Rates of cesarean delivery--United States, 1991. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1993;42:285–9.
-
- Opoien HK, Valbo A, Grinde-Andersen A, Walberg M. Post-cesarean surgical site infections according to CDC standards: rates and risk factors. A prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:1097–102. doi: 10.1080/00016340701515225 - DOI
-
- Tran TS, Jamulitrat S, Chongsuvivatwong V, Geater A. Risk factors for postcesarean surgical site infection. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:367–71. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00540-2 - DOI
-
- Couto RC, Pedrosa TM, Nogueira JM, Gomes DL, Neto MF, Rezende NA. Post-discharge surveillance and infection rates in obstetric patients. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1998;61:227–31. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(98)00047-2 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
