Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 1;139(5):855-865.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004749. Epub 2022 Apr 5.

County-Level Associations Between Pregnancy-Related Mortality Ratios and Contextual Sociospatial Indicators

Affiliations

County-Level Associations Between Pregnancy-Related Mortality Ratios and Contextual Sociospatial Indicators

Chloe M Barrera et al. Obstet Gynecol. .

Abstract

Objective: To characterize county-level differences in pregnancy-related mortality as a function of sociospatial indicators.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional multilevel analysis of all pregnancy-related deaths and all live births with available ZIP code or county data in the Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System during 2011-2016 for non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic (all races), and non-Hispanic White women aged 15-44 years. The exposures included 31 conceptually-grounded, county-specific sociospatial indicators that were collected from publicly available data sources and categorized into domains of demographic; general, reproductive, and behavioral health; social capital and support; and socioeconomic contexts. We calculated the absolute difference of county-level pregnancy-related mortality ratios (deaths per 100,000 live births) per 1-unit increase in the median absolute difference between women living in counties with higher compared with lower levels of each sociospatial indicator overall and stratified by race and ethnicity.

Results: Pregnancy-related mortality varied across counties and by race and ethnicity. Many sociospatial indicators were associated with county-specific pregnancy-related mortality ratios independent of maternal age, population size, and Census region. Across domains, the most harmful indicators were percentage of low-birth-weight births (absolute ratio difference [RD] 6.44; 95% CI 5.36-7.51), percentage of unemployed adults (RD 4.98; 95% CI 3.91-6.05), and food insecurity (RD 4.92; 95% CI 4.14-5.70). The most protective indicators were higher median household income (RD -2.76; 95% CI -3.28 to -2.24), percentage of college-educated adults (RD -2.28; 95% CI -2.81 to -1.75), and percentage of owner-occupied households (RD -1.66; 95% CI -2.29 to -1.03). The magnitude of these associations varied by race and ethnicity.

Conclusion: This analysis identified sociospatial indicators of pregnancy-related mortality and showed an association between pregnancy-related deaths and place of residence overall and stratified by race and ethnicity. Understanding county-level context associated with pregnancy-related mortality may be an important step towards building public health evidence to inform action to reduce pregnancy-related mortality at local levels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.. Heterogeneity in measures of association between sociospatial indicators and pregnancy-related mortality ratios for non-Hispanic Black women and non-Hispanic White women. The pregnancy-related mortality ratio is the number of pregnancy-related deaths per 100,000 live births. Each point represents the ratio difference in the pregnancy-related mortality ratio. The ratio difference estimates the difference in the pregnancy-related mortality ratio between women living in counties that differ by 1 standardized unit (eg, the median absolute difference). *P<.05, P<.01. P-values refer to the statistical significance of the test for heterogeneous effects of each sociospatial indicator by race and ethnicity (eg, for non-Hispanic Black women and non-Hispanic White women). Domains: demographic (A); general, reproductive, and behavioral health (B); social capital and support (C); socioeconomic (D). GED, general education development test; GP, general practitioner.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pregnancy mortality surveillance system. Accessed December 3, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternal-mortality/pregnancy-mort...
    1. Kramer MR, Strahan AE, Preslar J, Zaharatos J, St Pierre A, Grant JE, et al. . Changing the conversation: applying a health equity framework to maternal mortality reviews. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;221:609.e1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.057 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Merkt PT, Kramer MR, Goodman DA, Brantley MD, Barrera CM, Eckhaus L, et al. Urban-rural differences in pregnancy-related deaths, United States, 2011-2016. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021;225:183.e1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.028 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang Y, Tanbo T, Abyholm T, Henriksen T. The impact of advanced maternal age and parity on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011;284:31–7. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1587-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, Herbst MA, Meyers JA, Hankins GD. Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:36.e1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.007 - DOI - PubMed