Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 May 1;67(3):173-191.
doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-21-00072.

Medical Complexity Mediates Healthcare Resource Use in the Socially Vulnerable

Affiliations
Observational Study

Medical Complexity Mediates Healthcare Resource Use in the Socially Vulnerable

Alexandra L Hanlon et al. J Healthc Manag. .

Abstract

Goal: The objective of this retrospective, observational study was to assess the mediating effect of medical complexity on the relationship between social vulnerability and four acute care resource use outcomes-number of hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, observation stays, and total visits. Such information may help healthcare managers better anticipate the effects of interventions targeted to the socially vulnerable in their patient population.

Methods: Electronic health records of 147,496 adults served by 27 primary care practices in one large health system from 2015 to 2017 were used. Descriptive statistics were applied to characterize patients and the primary care practices included in the study. Causal mediation analyses using a modified Baron and Kenny approach were performed.

Principal findings: Causal mediation analyses demonstrated that increased social vulnerability was associated with increased medical complexity (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.57) and increased numbers of hospitalizations (IRR = 1.63), ED visits (IRR = 2.14), observation stays (IRR = 1.94), and total visits (IRR = 2.04). Effects remained significant, though attenuated, after adjusting for medical complexity (mediator), demographics, and medications (hospitalizations IRR = 1.44, ED visits IRR = 2.02, observation stays IRR = 1.74, total visits IRR = 1.86). Social vulnerability, given medical complexity, explained between 8% (ED visits) and 26% (hospitalizations) of the variation in outcomes.

Practical applications: These findings reinforce the need to modify interventions for medically complex adults to address their social needs and, consequently, reduce costly health services. Health systems seeking to reduce costly care can use these results to estimate savings in the treatment of patients with high social vulnerability-before they get chronic conditions and later as they seek care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mediation model effects of number of Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs) on the relationship between overall Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and resource use outcomes (A-D for hospitalizations, ED visits, observation stays, and total visits), Primary analyses

References

    1. Abbas A, Madison Hyer J, & Pawlik TM (2020). Race/Ethnicity and County-Level Social Vulnerability Impact Hospice Utilization Among Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 10.1245/s10434-020-09227-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agniel D, Kohane IS, & Weber GM (2018). Biases in electronic health record data due to processes within the healthcare system: retrospective observational study. BMJ, 361, k1479. 10.1136/bmj.k1479 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. An R, Xiang X. (2015). Social vulnerability and obesity among U.S. Adults. Int J Health Sci, 3, 7–21.
    1. Bakkensen LA, Fox-Lent C, Read LK, & Linkov I. (2017). Validating Resilience and Vulnerability Indices in the Context of Natural Disasters. Risk Anal, 37(5), 982–1004. 10.1111/risa.12677 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baron RM, & Kenny DA (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol, 51(6), 1173–1182. 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types