Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 18;72(723):e693-e701.
doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0548. Online ahead of print.

Two-year outcomes of UK patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation: findings from the prospective observational cohort study GARFIELD-AF

Affiliations

Two-year outcomes of UK patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation: findings from the prospective observational cohort study GARFIELD-AF

Patricia N Apenteng et al. Br J Gen Pract. .

Abstract

Background: The outcomes of patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF) following the introduction of direct-acting oral anticoagulants are not well known.

Aim: To determine the 2-year outcomes of patients newly diagnosed with AF, and the effectiveness of oral anticoagulants in everyday practice.

Design and setting: This was a prospective observational cohort study in UK primary care.

Method: In total, 3574 patients aged ≥18 years with a new AF diagnosis were enrolled. A propensity score was applied using an overlap weighting scheme to obtain unbiased estimates of the treatment effect of anticoagulation versus no anticoagulation on the occurrence of death, non-haemorrhagic stroke/systemic embolism, and major bleeding within 2 years of diagnosis.

Results: Overall, 65.8% received anticoagulant therapy, 20.8% received an antiplatelet only, and 13.4% received neither. During the study period, the overall incidence rates of all-cause mortality, non-haemorrhagic stroke/systemic embolism, and major bleeding were 4.15 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.69 to 4.65), 1.45 (95% CI = 1.19 to 1.77), and 1.21 (95% CI = 0.97 to 1.50) per 100 person-years, respectively. Anticoagulation treatment compared with no anticoagulation treatment was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.70 (95% CI = 0.53 to 0.93), significantly lower risk of non-haemorrhagic stroke/systemic embolism (aHR 0.39, 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.62), and a non-significant higher risk of major bleeding (aHR 1.31, 95% CI = 0.77 to 2.24).

Conclusion: The data support a benefit of anticoagulation in reducing stroke and death, without an increased risk of a major bleed in patients with new-onset AF. Anticoagulation treatment in patients at high risk of stroke who are not receiving anticoagulation may further improve outcomes.

Keywords: all-cause mortality; anticoagulation; atrial fibrillation; bleeding; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
a) Treatment at diagnosis by CHA2DS2-VASc score. b) Treatment at diagnosis by HAS-BLED score. AP = antiplatelet. DTI + AP = direct thrombin inhibitor and antiplatelet. FXa + AP = factor Xa inhibitor and antiplatelet. VKA + AP = vitamin K antagonist and antiplatelet.
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
a) Treatment at diagnosis by CHA2DS2-VASc score. b) Treatment at diagnosis by HAS-BLED score. AP = antiplatelet. DTI + AP = direct thrombin inhibitor and antiplatelet. FXa + AP = factor Xa inhibitor and antiplatelet. VKA + AP = vitamin K antagonist and antiplatelet.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
a) Event rates according to CHA2DS2-VASc score. Includes only patients with available CHA2DS2-VASc scores (n = 3528). b) Event rates according to HAS-BLED scores. Includes only patients with available HAS-BLED scores (n = 2530). SE = systemic embolism.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
a) Event rates according to CHA2DS2-VASc score. Includes only patients with available CHA2DS2-VASc scores (n = 3528). b) Event rates according to HAS-BLED scores. Includes only patients with available HAS-BLED scores (n = 2530). SE = systemic embolism.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios of OAC versus no OAC (reference) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals for selected outcomes at 2 years of follow-up in UK patients. Adjusted hazard ratios were obtained using an overlap-weighted Cox model. Variables included in the weighting scheme are: cohort enrolment, sex, age, ethnicity, type of AF, care setting specialty and location, congestive heart failure, acute coronary syndromes, vascular disease, carotid occlusive disease, prior stroke/transient ischaemic attack/SE, prior bleeding, venous thromboembolism, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, cirrhosis, moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease, dementia, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, current smoking, heavy alcohol consumption, body mass index, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure at diagnosis, and baseline antiplatelet use. AF = atrial fibrillation. OAC = oral anticoagulant. SE = systemic embolism.

References

    1. Wolf P. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991;8(22):983–988. - PubMed
    1. Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Reith J, et al. Acute stroke with atrial fibrillation. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke. 1996;27(10):1765–1769. - PubMed
    1. Risk factors for stroke and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation; an analysis of pooled data from five randomised controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(13):1449–1457. - PubMed
    1. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Kardiol Pol. 2016;50(5):e1–e88. - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: management. 2014:CG180. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg180 (accessed 5 May 2022). - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources