Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 May;28(5):958-964.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01808-0. Epub 2022 May 16.

Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine patches for smoking cessation in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine patches for smoking cessation in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial

Peter Hajek et al. Nat Med. 2022 May.

Erratum in

Abstract

Nicotine replacement therapy, in the form of nicotine patches, is commonly offered to pregnant women who smoke to help them to stop smoking, but this approach has limited efficacy in this population. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are also used by pregnant women who smoke but their safety and efficacy in pregnancy are unknown. Here, we report the results of a randomized controlled trial in 1,140 participants comparing refillable e-cigarettes with nicotine patches. Pregnant women who smoked were randomized to e-cigarettes (n = 569) or nicotine patches (n = 571). In the unadjusted analysis of the primary outcome, validated prolonged quit rates at the end of pregnancy in the two study arms were not significantly different (6.8% versus 4.4% in the e-cigarette and patch arms, respectively; relative risk (RR) = 1.55, 95%CI: 0.95-2.53, P = 0.08). However, some participants in the nicotine patch group also used e-cigarettes during the study. In a pre-specified sensitivity analysis excluding abstinent participants who used non-allocated products, e-cigarettes were more effective than patches (6.8% versus 3.6%; RR = 1.93, 95%CI: 1.14-3.26, P = 0.02). Safety outcomes included adverse events and maternal and birth outcomes. The safety profile was found to be similar for both study products, however, low birthweight (<2,500 g) was less frequent in the e-cigarette arm (14.8% versus 9.6%; RR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.47-0.90, P = 0.01). Other adverse events and birth outcomes were similar in the two study arms. E-cigarettes might help women who are pregnant to stop smoking, and their safety for use in pregnancy is similar to that of nicotine patches. ISRCTN62025374.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

P.H. provided consultancy to and received research funding from Pfizer. D.P. received research funding from Pfizer. H.M. has received honoraria for speaking at smoking cessation educational events and sitting on an advisory board organized by Pfizer. All other authors have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Participants flow.
Diagram of the flow of participants through the trial. Participants were recruited from 23 hospital sites in England and from one NHS Stop Smoking Service in Scotland.

Comment in

References

    1. Salihu HM, Wilson RE. Epidemiology of prenatal smoking and perinatal outcomes. Early Hum. Dev. 2007;83:713–720. - PubMed
    1. Rogers JM. Tobacco and pregnancy: overview of exposures and effects. Birth Defects Res. C Embryo Today. 2008;84:1–15. - PubMed
    1. Abraham M, et al. A systematic review of maternal smoking during pregnancy and fetal measurements with meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0170946. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marufu TC, Ahankari A, Coleman T, Lewis S. Maternal smoking and the risk of still birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:239. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang I, Hall L. Factors related to prenatal smoking among socioeconomically disadvantaged women. Women Health. 2019;59:1026–1074. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data