Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 16;22(1):989.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13406-3.

Understanding the risk perception of visceral leishmaniasis exposure and the acceptability of sandfly protection measures among migrant workers in the lowlands of Northwest Ethiopia: a health belief model perspective

Resom Berhe  1 , Mark Spigt  2 , Francine Schneider  3 , Lucy Paintain  4 , Cherinet Adera  5 , Adane Nigusie  6 , Zemichael Gizaw  7 , Yihenew Alemu Tesfaye  8 , Dia-Eldin A Elnaiem  9 , Mekuriaw Alemayehu  7
Affiliations

Understanding the risk perception of visceral leishmaniasis exposure and the acceptability of sandfly protection measures among migrant workers in the lowlands of Northwest Ethiopia: a health belief model perspective

Resom Berhe et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is the leading cause of health concerns among Ethiopian migrant workers. Understanding risk perception and health-protective behavior are significant challenges in the prevention and eradication of the disease. As a result, studies are required to assess these important epidemiological factors, which will provide guidance on how to assist migrant workers in taking preventive measures against VL.

Method: We conducted qualitative research among migrant workers on seasonal agricultural farms in Northwest Ethiopia between June and November 2019 to assess their perception of the risk of contracting VL and their willingness to use protective measures against the disease. Seventeen focus group discussions and 16 key informant interviews were conducted to study migrant workers' risk perception in relation to sandfly bite exposure and use of sandfly control measures. For analysis, all interviews were recorded, transcribed, and translated. ATLASti was used to perform qualitative content analysis on the data.

Result: Migrant workers are fearful of VL because of previous exposure and the disease's prevalence in the area. They believe, however, that VL is a minor illness that is easily treated. While Insecticide Treated Nets (ITNs) are widely accepted as a protective measure, there are still reservations about using them due to the seasonality of the transmission, difficulties in hanging them on farm areas, and a preference for alternative traditional practices. Regardless of perceived self-efficacy, the central cues were the message delivered by the health workers and an increase in sandfly bite irritation. Based on the findings, three levels of intervention modalities are suggested: 1) increasing pre-arrival awareness through outdoor media (posters, stickers, billboards), 2) encouraging proper use of protective measures upon arrival at farm camps, and 3) informing departing workers on disease recognition and best practices for health-seeking continuous use of protective measures at home.

Conclusion: This finding suggests that VL prevention interventions should focus on individuals' perceptions in order to promote consistent use of protective measures. The findings are highly useful in planning effective interventions against VL.

Keywords: Health belief model; Leishmaniasis; Perception; Qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Results of Focus group discussion and key informant interviews. Note. ITN=Insecticide treated net
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Visual representation (word cloud) of a perceived barrier for utilization of protective measures
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Three-level intervention modalities for prevention and control of Leishmaniasis among migrant workers
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. "Leishmaniasis and HIV co-infection". 2015. WHO Fact sheet N°1075. Retrieved 23 January 2021.
    1. Das A, Karthick M, Dwivedi S, Banerjee I, Mahapatra T, Srikantiah S, Chaudhuri I. Epidemiologic correlates of mortality among symptomatic visceral Leishmaniasis cases: findings from situation assessment in high endemic foci in India. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(11):e0005150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005150. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Desjeux P. The increase of risk factors for Leishmaniasis worldwide. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001;95(3):239–243. doi: 10.1016/S0035-9203(01)90223-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guerin P, Olliaro P, Sundar S. Visceral leishmaniasis: current status of control, diagnosis, and treatment, and a proposed research and development agenda. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2:494–501. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(02)00347-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chappuis F, Sundar S, Hailu A, Ghalib H, Rijal S, Peeling RW. Visceral Leishmaniasis: what are the needs for diagnosis, treatment, and control? Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:873–882. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1748. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types