Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023;33(3):1055-1086.
doi: 10.1007/s10798-022-09756-z. Epub 2022 May 12.

Structuring knowledge-building in online design education

Affiliations

Structuring knowledge-building in online design education

Kutay Güler. Int J Technol Des Educ. 2023.

Abstract

Design education has traditionally been deemed a face-to-face endeavor causing online learning to be disregarded as a viable teaching option. Nonetheless, the recent impact of COVID-19 pressured design schools to rapidly migrate online, impelling many educators to utilize this unfamiliar and largely dismissed methodology. The impending problems exposed with this sudden shift point to a significant gap in research. Accordingly, this study proposes a set of guidelines targeting design knowledge-building, based on an in-depth look at student experience during an online design course. Data were collected through a 63-item course efficiency survey (n = 59) and a series of semi-structured focus group interviews (n = 16) with the enrolled students. The following overarching themes emerged through iterative thematic analysis of the interview data: (1) flexibility and handling stress, (2) managing self-pacing issues (3) formal conversation platform, (4) content variety and access options. The themes were interpreted in relation to the survey findings and the broader research on learning. The proposed guidelines emphasize initially clear goals and objectives, pacing flexibility with progress guidance, content and communication variety, sense of presence and peer exposure, and individualized feedback. It is expected that the guidelines will be helpful in building, conducting, and evaluating future online design knowledge-building experiences.

Keywords: Course development; Design education; Knowledge building; Online learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Akar, E., Öztürk, E., Tuncer, B., & Wiethoff, M. (2004). Evaluation of a collaborative virtual learning environment. Education + Training, 46(6/7), 343–352. 10.1108/00400910410555259
    1. Allen E. Second studio: A model for technical teaching. Journal of Architectural Education. 1997;51(2):92–95. doi: 10.1080/10464883.1997.10734756. - DOI
    1. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2008). NASULGC–Sloan national commission on online learning benchmarking study: Preliminary findings. The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved November 26, 2009, from www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/entering_mainstream.pdf
    1. Almeida F. Concept and dimensions of Web 4.0. International Journal of Computers and Technology. 2017;16(7):7040–7046. doi: 10.24297/ijct.v16i7.6446. - DOI
    1. Althaus SL. Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with online discussions. Communication Education. 1997;46(3):158–174. doi: 10.1080/03634529709379088. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources