Living Donor Liver Transplant Center Volume Influences Waiting List Survival Among Children Listed for Liver Transplantation
- PMID: 35579406
- DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004173
Living Donor Liver Transplant Center Volume Influences Waiting List Survival Among Children Listed for Liver Transplantation
Abstract
Background: Pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains infrequently performed in the United States and localized to a few centers. This study aimed to compare pediatric waiting list and posttransplant outcomes by LDLT center volume.
Methods: The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database was retrospectively reviewed for all pediatric (age <18 y) liver transplant candidates listed between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2019. The average annual number of LDLT, deceased donor partial liver transplant (DDPLT), and overall (ie, LDLT + DDPLT + whole liver transplants) pediatric liver transplants performed by each transplant center during the study period was calculated.
Results: Of 88 transplant centers, only 44 (50%) performed at least 1 pediatric LDLT during the study period. LDLT, DDPLT, and overall transplant center volume were all positively correlated. LDLT center volume was protective against waiting list dropout after adjusting for confounding variables (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.97; P = 0.004), whereas DDPLT and overall center volume were not ( P > 0.05); however, DDPLT center volume was significantly protective against both recipient death and graft loss, whereas overall volume was only protective against graft loss and LDLT volume was not protective for either.
Conclusions: High-volume pediatric LDLT center can improve waiting list survival, whereas DDPLT and overall volume are associated with posttransplant survival. Expertise in all types of pediatric liver transplant options is important to optimize outcomes.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
Editorial: Optimizing Outcomes for Children Requires Ensuring Access to Living: Donor and Split Liver Transplants.Transplantation. 2022 Sep 1;106(9):1736-1737. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004174. Epub 2022 Aug 19. Transplantation. 2022. PMID: 35579402 No abstract available.
References
-
- Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. National data. Available at https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/view-data-reports/national-data . Accessed March 10, 2021.
-
- Rana A, Pallister Z, Halazun K, et al. Pediatric liver transplant center volume and the likelihood of transplantation. Pediatrics. 2015;136:e99–e107.
-
- Yoeli D, Goss M, Galván NTN, et al. Trends in pediatric liver transplant donors and deceased donor circumstance of death in the United States, 2002-2015. Pediatr Transplant. 2018;22:e13156.
-
- Diamond IR, Fecteau A, Millis JM, et al.; SPLIT Research Group. Impact of graft type on outcome in pediatric liver transplantation: a report from Studies of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT). Ann Surg. 2007;246:301–310.
-
- Mogul DB, Luo X, Bowring MG, et al. Fifteen-year trends in pediatric liver transplants: split, whole deceased, and living donor grafts. J Pediatr. 2018;196:148–153.e2.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical