Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2212444.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12444.

Comparison of Outcomes of Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Performed by Surgical Fellows vs Faculty

Affiliations

Comparison of Outcomes of Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Performed by Surgical Fellows vs Faculty

Abbas M Hassan et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Concern regarding surgical trainees' operative autonomy has increased in recent years, emphasizing patient safety and preparation for independent practice. Regarding abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR), long-term outcomes of fellow autonomy have yet to be delineated.

Objectives: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of AWRs performed by fellows and compare them with those of AWRs performed by assistant, associate, and senior-level professors.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent AWR for ventral hernias or repair of tumor resection defects at a 710-bed tertiary cancer center between March 1, 2005, and June 30, 2019. The analysis was conducted between January 2020 and December 2021.

Exposure: Academic rank of primary surgeon.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was hernia recurrence. Secondary outcomes were surgical site occurrence, surgical site infection, length of hospital stay, unplanned return to the operating room, and 30-day readmission. Multivariable hierarchical models were constructed to identify predictive factors.

Results: Of 810 consecutive patients, 720 (mean [SD] age, 59.8 [11.5] years; 375 female [52.1%]) met the inclusion criteria. Mean (SD) body mass index was 31.4 (6.7), and mean (SD) follow-up time was 42 (29) months. Assistant professors performed the most AWRs (276 [38.3%]), followed by associate professors (169 [23.5%]), senior-level professors (157 [21.8%]), and microsurgical fellows (118 [16.4%]). Compared with fellows and more junior surgeons, senior-level professors tended to operate on significantly older patients (mean [SD] age, 59.9 [10.9] years; P = .03), more patients with obesity (103 [65.6%]; P = .003), and patients with larger defects (247.9 [216.0] cm; P < .001), parastomal hernias (27 [17.2%]; P = .001), or rectus muscle violation (53 [33.8%]; P = .03). No significant differences were found for hernia recurrence, surgical site occurrence, surgical site infection, 30-day readmission rates, or length of stay among the fellows and assistant, associate, and senior-level professors in adjusted models. Compared with fellows, assistant professors (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08-0.64) and senior-level professors (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.69) had lower rates of unplanned return to the operating room.

Conclusions and relevance: This cohort study provides evidence-based reassurance that providing fellows with autonomy in performing AWRs does not compromise long-term patient outcomes. These findings may incite efforts to increase appropriate surgical trainee autonomy, thereby empowering future generations of competent, independent surgeons.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Butler reported receiving consulting fees from Tela Bio, Allergan, Becton, Dickinson and Company, and ECM Biosurgery outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kilminster SM, Jolly BC. Effective supervision in clinical practice settings: a literature review. Med Educ. 2000;34(10):827-840. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00758.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kennedy TJ, Regehr G, Baker GR, Lingard LA. Progressive independence in clinical training: a tradition worth defending? Acad Med. 2005;80(10)(suppl):S106-S111. doi:10.1097/00001888-200510001-00028 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Laine C, Goldman L, Soukup JR, Hayes JG. The impact of a regulation restricting medical house staff working hours on the quality of patient care. JAMA. 1993;269(3):374-378. doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03500030072035 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Steinbrook R. The debate over residents’ work hours. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1296-1302. doi:10.1056/NEJMhpr022383 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Charap M. Reducing resident work hours: unproven assumptions and unforeseen outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(10):814-815. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-140-10-200405180-00011 - DOI - PubMed