Endoscopic Versus Surgical Step-Up Approach for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis (ExTENSION): Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Trial
- PMID: 35580661
- DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.05.015
Endoscopic Versus Surgical Step-Up Approach for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis (ExTENSION): Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Trial
Abstract
Background & aims: Previous randomized trials, including the Transluminal Endoscopic Step-Up Approach Versus Minimally Invasive Surgical Step-Up Approach in Patients With Infected Pancreatic Necrosis (TENSION) trial, demonstrated that the endoscopic step-up approach might be preferred over the surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis based on favorable short-term outcomes. We compared long-term clinical outcomes of both step-up approaches after a period of at least 5 years.
Methods: In this long-term follow-up study, we reevaluated all clinical data on 83 patients (of the originally 98 included patients) from the TENSION trial who were still alive after the initial 6-month follow-up. The primary end point, similar to the TENSION trial, was a composite of death and major complications. Secondary end points included individual major complications, pancreaticocutaneous fistula, reinterventions, pancreatic insufficiency, and quality of life.
Results: After a mean follow-up period of 7 years, the primary end point occurred in 27 patients (53%) in the endoscopy group and in 27 patients (57%) in the surgery group (risk ratio [RR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-1.32; P = .688). Fewer pancreaticocutaneous fistulas were identified in the endoscopy group (8% vs 34%; RR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08-0.83). After the initial 6-month follow-up, the endoscopy group needed fewer reinterventions than the surgery group (7% vs 24%; RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.99). Pancreatic insufficiency and quality of life did not differ between groups.
Conclusions: At long-term follow-up, the endoscopic step-up approach was not superior to the surgical step-up approach in reducing death or major complications in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis. However, patients assigned to the endoscopic approach developed overall fewer pancreaticocutaneous fistulas and needed fewer reinterventions after the initial 6-month follow-up. Netherlands Trial Register no: NL8571.
Keywords: Endoscopy; Minimally Invasive Step-up Approach; Necrotizing Pancreatitis; Surgery; TENSION trial.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Navigating the Stormy Sea of Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Are We There Yet? Well Almost!Gastroenterology. 2022 Sep;163(3):578-581. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.06.082. Epub 2022 Jul 3. Gastroenterology. 2022. PMID: 35793777 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711].BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov 25;13:161. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-161. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 24274589 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Superiority of Step-up Approach vs Open Necrosectomy in Long-term Follow-up of Patients With Necrotizing Pancreatitis.Gastroenterology. 2019 Mar;156(4):1016-1026. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.045. Epub 2018 Nov 2. Gastroenterology. 2019. PMID: 30391468 Clinical Trial.
-
An Endoscopic Transluminal Approach, Compared With Minimally Invasive Surgery, Reduces Complications and Costs for Patients With Necrotizing Pancreatitis.Gastroenterology. 2019 Mar;156(4):1027-1040.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.11.031. Epub 2018 Nov 16. Gastroenterology. 2019. PMID: 30452918 Clinical Trial.
-
American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice Update: Management of Pancreatic Necrosis.Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(1):67-75.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.064. Epub 2019 Aug 31. Gastroenterology. 2020. PMID: 31479658 Review.
-
Superiority of endoscopic interventions over minimally invasive surgery for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: meta-analysis of randomized trials.Dig Endosc. 2020 Mar;32(3):298-308. doi: 10.1111/den.13470. Epub 2019 Aug 1. Dig Endosc. 2020. PMID: 31220368
Cited by
-
Risk of recurrence with or without plastic stent after EUS-guided treatment of peripancreatic fluid collections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Endosc Int Open. 2024 Feb 12;12(2):E188-E198. doi: 10.1055/a-2226-1237. eCollection 2024 Feb. Endosc Int Open. 2024. PMID: 38348330 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Endoscopic transpapillary drainage for walled-off pancreatic necrosis with complete main pancreatic duct disruption by metallic stent placement: A retrospective study.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 7;9:1064463. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1064463. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36569130 Free PMC article.
-
Recent Treatment Strategies for Acute Pancreatitis.J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 8;13(4):978. doi: 10.3390/jcm13040978. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38398290 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current trends in acute pancreatitis: Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.World J Gastroenterol. 2023 May 14;29(18):2747-2763. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i18.2747. World J Gastroenterol. 2023. PMID: 37274068 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A systematic review of machine learning-based prognostic models for acute pancreatitis: Towards improving methods and reporting quality.PLoS Med. 2025 Feb 24;22(2):e1004432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004432. eCollection 2025 Feb. PLoS Med. 2025. PMID: 39992936 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical