Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 1:175:106084.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106084. Epub 2022 May 14.

Effect of health warning labels on motivation towards energy-dense snack foods: Two experimental studies

Affiliations

Effect of health warning labels on motivation towards energy-dense snack foods: Two experimental studies

Minna Ventsel et al. Appetite. .

Abstract

Health warning labels (HWLs) show promise in reducing motivation towards energy-dense snack foods. Understanding the underlying mechanisms could optimise their effectiveness. In two experimental studies in general population samples (Study 1 n = 90; Study 2 n = 1382), we compared the effects of HWLs and irrelevant aversive labels (IALs) on implicit (approach) motivation towards unhealthy snacks, using an approach-avoidance task (Study 1), and a manikin task (Study 2). We also assessed explicit motivation towards unhealthy snacks using food selection tasks. We examined whether labelling effects on motivation arose from the creation of outcome-dependent associations between the food and its health consequences or from simple, non-specific aversive associations. Both label types reduced motivation towards snack foods but only when the label was physically present. HWLs and IALs showed similar effects on implicit motivation, although HWLs reduced explicit motivation more than IALs. Thus, aversive HWLs appear to act both through low level associative mechanisms affecting implicit motivation, and by additionally emphasizing explicit causal links to health outcomes thereby affecting explicitly motivated choice behaviours.

Keywords: Approach-avoidance; Choice behavior; Explicit motivation; Implicit motivation; Manikin task; Snack selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Examples of chocolate bars with (a) a HWL and (b) an IAL.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The flow of the steps of Study 1.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The flow of the steps of Study 2.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Study 2: Healthier snack selection between study groups. Error bars are 95% CI. P values are between study groups. Health Warning Label (HWL). Irrelevant Aversive label (IAL).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Altman D.G., Bland J.M. How to obtain the P value from a confidence interval. BMJ. 2011;343:d2304. - PubMed
    1. Asbridge S.C.M., Pechey E., Marteau T.M., Hollands G.J. Effects of pairing health warning labels with energy-dense snack foods on food choice and attitudes: Online experimental study. Appetite. 2021;160:105090. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brewer N.T., Hall M.G., Noar S.M., Parada H., Stein-Seroussi A., Bach L.E., et al. Effect of pictorial cigarette pack warnings on changes in smoking behavior: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2016;176(7):905–912. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brewer N.T., Parada H., Hall M.G., Boynton M.H., Noar S.M., Ribisl K.M. Understanding why pictorial cigarette pack warnings increase quit attempts. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2019;53(3):232–243. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buykx P., Li J., Gavens L., Hooper L., Lovatt M., Gomes de Matos E., et al. Public awareness of the link between alcohol and cancer in England in 2015: A population-based survey. BMC Public Health. 2016;16 1194. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources