Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 29;77(12):2445-2452.
doi: 10.1093/gerona/glac112.

Thigh Muscle Composition and Its Relationship to Functional Recovery Post Hip Fracture Over Time and Between Sexes

Affiliations

Thigh Muscle Composition and Its Relationship to Functional Recovery Post Hip Fracture Over Time and Between Sexes

Marty Eastlack et al. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Computed tomography (CT)-scan measures of muscle composition may be associated with recovery post hip fracture.

Methods: In an ancillary study to Baltimore Hip Studies Seventh cohort, older adults were evaluated at 2 and 6 months post hip fracture. CT-scan measures of muscle were acquired at 2 months. Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) was measured at 2 and 6 months. Generalized estimating equations were used to model the association of muscle measures and physical function, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and time postfracture.

Results: Seventy-one older adults (52% males, age 79.6 ± 7.3 years) were included. At 2-months, males had greater thigh cross-sectional area (CSA, p < .0001) and less low-density muscle (p = .047), and intermuscular adipose tissue (p = .007) than females on the side of the fracture, while females performed better on the SPPB (p = .05). Muscle measures on the fractured side were associated with function at 2 months in both sexes. Participants with the lowest tertile of muscle CSA difference at 2-months, indicating greater symmetry in CSA between limbs, performed better than the other 2 tertiles at 6-months. Males performed worse in functional measures at baseline and did not recover as well as females (p = .02).

Conclusion: CT-scan measures of muscle CSA and fatty infiltration were associated with function at 2-months post hip fracture and with improvement in function by 6 months. Observed sex differences in these associations suggest that rehabilitation strategies may need to be adapted by sex after hip fracture.

Keywords: Computed tomography (CT scan); Physical function; Sex differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
GEE Model 2 of fractured side muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) at 2 months depicted in tertiles for the 3 functional measures (A) gait speed, p ≤ .005; (B) chair rise time, p ≤ .001; and (C) SPPB score, p = .008. p values are for GEE model run with continuous muscle CSA and functional measures data. GEE = generalized estimating equations; SPPB = Short Physical Performance Battery.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
GEE Model 2 between fractured side muscle attenuation (MA) at 2 months depicted in tertiles for the functional measures (A) gait speed, p ≤ .05. Post hoc testing; *p = .03 between tertile 1 (lower) and 2 (mid), **p = .03 between tertile 1 and 3 (upper), and +p = .03 between tertile 2 and 3 and (B) SPPB Score. GEE = generalized estimating equations; SPPB = Short Physical Performance Battery.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Association of muscle CSA difference with time-dependent change from 2 to 6 months (Model 1) depicted by tertiles in (A) gait speed, p = .06 (B) and SPPB score, p ≤ .01. p values are for GEE models run with continuous muscle composition and functional measures data. CSA = cross-sectional area; GEE = generalized estimating equations; SPPB = Short Physical Performance Battery.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
GEE Model 2 including sex and (A) chair rise time, *p ≤ .01; (B) SPPB score, #p ≤ .05; and (C) association of sex with time-dependent change from 2 to 6 months in chair rise time, p = .02. GEE = generalized estimating equations; SPPB = Short Physical Performance Battery.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(3):465–475. doi:10.1359/jbmr.061113 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Magaziner J, Simonsick EM, Kashner TM, Hebel JR, Kenzora JE. Predictors of functional recovery one year following hospital discharge for hip fracture: a prospective study. J Gerontol. 1990;45(3):M101–M107. doi:10.1093/geronj/45.3.m101 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Magaziner J, Hawkes W, Hebel JR, et al. . Recovery from hip fracture in eight areas of function. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55(9):M498–M507. doi:10.1093/gerona/55.9.M498 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Keene GS, Parker MJ, Pryor GA. Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures. Br Med J. 1993;307(6914):1248–1250. doi:10.1136/bmj.307.6914.1248 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hawkes WG, Wehren L, Orwig D, Hebel JR, Magaziner J. Gender differences in functioning after hip fracture. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(5):495–499. doi:10.1093/gerona/61.5.495 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types