Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 17;80(1):139.
doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00844-z.

The InfAct proposal for a sustainable European health information infrastructure on population health: the Distributed Infrastructure on Population Health (DIPoH)

Affiliations

The InfAct proposal for a sustainable European health information infrastructure on population health: the Distributed Infrastructure on Population Health (DIPoH)

Rodrigo Sarmiento-Suárez et al. Arch Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: In Europe, data on population health is fragmented, difficult to access, project-based and prone to health information inequalities in terms of availability, accessibility and especially in quality between and within countries. This situation is further exacerbated and exposed by the recent COVID-19 pandemic. The Joint Action on Health Information (InfAct) that builds on previous works of the BRIDGE Health project, carried out collaborative action to set up a sustainable infrastructure for health information in the European Union (EU). The aim of this paper is to present InfAct's proposal for a sustainable research infrastructure, the Distributed Infrastructure on Population Health (DIPoH), which includes the setup of a Health Information Portal on population health to be maintained beyond InfAct's time span.

Methods: The strategy for the proposal was based on three components: scientific initiatives and proposals to improve Health Information Systems (HIS), exploration of technical acceptability and feasibility, and finally obtaining high-level political support.. The technical exploration (Technical Dialogues-TD) was assumed by technical experts proposed by the countries, and political guidance was provided by the Assembly of Members (AoM), which gathered representatives from Ministries of Health and Science of EU/EEA countries. The results from the AoM and the TD were integrated in the sustainability plan compiling all the major outputs of InfAct.

Results: The InfAct sustainability plan was organized in three main sections: a proposal of a new research infrastructure on population health (the DIPoH), new health information tools and innovative proposals for HIS, and a comprehensive capacity building programme. These activities were carried out in InfAct and are being further developed in the Population Health Information Research Infrastructure (PHIRI). PHIRI is a practical rollout of DIPoH facilitating and generating the best available evidence for research on health and wellbeing of populations as impacted by COVID-19.

Conclusions: The sustainability plan received wide support from Member States and was recognized to have an added value at EU level. Nevertheless, there were several aspects which still need to be considered for the near future such as: (i) a commitment of stable financial and political support by Member States (MSs), (ii) the availability of resources at regional, national and European level to deal with innovations, and (iii) a more direct involvement from EU and international institutions such as the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development OECD for providing support and sustainable contributions.

Keywords: Distributed Infrastructure on Population Health; Health Information; Health Information Systems; InfAct; Non-Communicable Diseases; Population Health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

HVO is one of the co-authors of this paper and the editor in chief of “Archives of Public Health”. RH is the one of the co-author of this paper and the section editor of “health information system” of “Archives of Public Health”.

The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. European Council. Council conclusions on the reflection process on modern, responsive and sustainable health systems. 2013. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/lsa/140.... Accessed 6 June 2020.
    1. Population Health Information Research Infrastructure (PHIRI), the PHIRI project, https://www.phiri.eu (2021). Accessed Apr 2021.
    1. InfAct Joint Action of Health Information: InfAct, the project https://www.inf-act.eu/background (2018). Accessed Mar 2021
    1. Bogaert P, van Oers H, Van Oyen H. Towards a sustainable EU health information infrastructure: a consensus driven approach. Health Policy. 2018;122(12):1340–1347. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.10.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schmidt A, Abboud L, Bogaert P. Making the case for strong health information systems during a pandemic and beyond. Arch Public Health. 2021;79:13. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00531-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources